Anchoring device and system for an intervertebral implant, intervertebral implant and implantation instrument

ABSTRACT

Various embodiments of intervertebral implants, anchoring devices for intervertebral implants, and implantation instrumentation are provided, along with various embodiments of methods for using one or more of the devices. Some embodiments of an anchoring device have a body comprising at least one curve and a rigid plate elongated along a longitudinal axis so that its front end enters at least one vertebra while its rear end remains in the passage of an implant. In some embodiments, the plate comprises at least one longitudinal slot separating at least one posterior portion of the plate into two branches, with at least one branch comprising at least one withdrawal stop configured to retain the device in the implant.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to French patentapplication Ser. No. 12/51733 filed in FRANCE on Feb. 24, 2012, which isincorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND

The present invention concerns orthopedic implants, including inparticular spinal implants such as intersomatic (or interbody) cages,for example. Intersomatic cages may be implanted between two adjacentvertebrae for placement and growth of bone tissue grafts (or asubstitute) in the disc space and to obtain an arthrodesis (the fusionof the two vertebrae). For example, after the cage is positioned, theintervertebral space may be filled with autologous spongy bone orsuitable bone substitutes, which may also (or in the alternative) beplaced in a cavity in the cage, prior to its positioning in theintervertebral space. In particular, the invention concernsintervertebral implants, implant anchors, the fixation of implants tovertebrae by anchors, and implantation of implants in the disc space byan implantation instrument.

One problem in this field concerns the stability of spinal implants inthe disc space once they have been implanted, particularly when anarthrodesis is desired, for example using intersomatic cages or otherimplants allowing an arthrodesis (which may, for example, be deployedwith auxiliary stabilizing structures such as osteosynthesis bars). Forexample, there is a risk that the implant will shift in theintervertebral space due to forces imposed when the patient moves, evenwhen the implant is provided with notches or teeth on its vertebralcontact surfaces. Therefore it is often necessary to affix the spinalimplant to the adjacent vertebrae between which it is implanted.Osteosynthesis bars also are often provided for immobilizing thevertebrae, preferably with a lordosis, to prevent the cage from movingfrom the intervertebral space. Solutions are known in the prior art thatprovide the spinal implant with a bone anchoring device that allowssolidly attaching the implant into the vertebral endplates of thevertebrae between which the implant is designed to be implanted.

Another problem in the field concerns the invasiveness and in particularthe access to the intervertebral spaces (disc spaces) which is oftenparticularly delicate due to the dimensions involved, particularly dueto the presence of blood vessels and nerves in the approach to theintervertebral space. Bone anchoring devices must penetrate into thevertebrae with sufficient depth to ensure a good fixation, and must alsohave a small size and allow affixing the implant without endangering thesurrounding blood vessels and nerves (for example, by not requiring morespace in the approach to the intervertebral space than necessary forimplantation of the spinal implant itself). In particular, someinterbody cages are designed to be implanted with a posterior (frombehind the patient) or transforaminal (through the foramen) approach(i.e., pathway). The posterior approach usually requires partialresection of the articular processes (joints) and passes between thedura and the articular processes (two cages disposed substantiallyparallel to the sagittal plane are generally provided). This approachthus uses a pathway which is very close to the spinal cord and requirescages of smaller size. The transforaminal approach use a pathway whichis oblique to the sagittal plane and requires cages with dimensions thatare reduced but with a sufficient length to be disposed obliquely orperpendicularly to the sagittal plane. The smallest possible accesspathways are generally sought so as to limit the invasiveness of thesurgical implantation. Moreover, in this spirit of limiting theinvasiveness, one eventually tries to avoid having to install posteriormaterial such as osteosynthesis bars (generally with pedicle screws).The use of anchoring means for attaching the cages could solve thisproblem if the anchoring means are reliable. The cages are usuallyplaced between the vertebrae in an anterior position on the endplates,for allowing to impose a lordosis. Osteosynthesis bars can be used tomaintain the lordosis which prevents the cage from sliding back, butanchoring means will be preferred instead if the fixation and stabilityof the implant obtained are reliable. Such anchoring means preferablyalso address the problem of limited invasiveness. Moreover, it isgenerally desired to be able to remove the bone anchoring means and theimplant. This requires that the anchoring means be retained in boneimplant stably but that they can also be removed as easily as possiblewith as little as possible invasiveness.

In the prior art, notably from published applications WO 2008/149223 andWO2011/080535 filed by the assignee of the present application, whichare incorporated herein by reference and to which the reader can referto examine various problems resolved and various advantages provided bythis type of solution, an anchoring device is known, suitable to beimplanted solidly and with sufficient depth in the vertebral endplatesto ensure that the implant is held tight against these vertebrae, butalong an axis of approach for insertion generally in the plane of theintervertebral space. This type of solution typically comprises at leastone anchor formed of a curved and rigid plate, arranged so as topenetrate into the endplate of a vertebra through an implant andprovided with at least one stop to hold this implant against thisvertebra. The rigidity of this type of anchor is an important feature toallow effective fixation, notably more effective than staples or otherthin and/or relatively flexible and often fragile devices. These typesof anchoring devices (or “anchors”) comprising a curved plate may pose aproblem of the risk of splitting the vertebra during the impaction ofthe anchors into the vertebra, or due to forces imposed on the implantand/or the anchor once it is implanted in the vertebra. These types ofanchors also may present a risk of making a cut that is too large duringthe impaction of the anchors into the vertebra, allowing the possibilityof undesirable play of the anchor, which makes the implant fixation weakand/or unreliable. Application WO2011/080535 aims at solving to thistype of problem. It should be noted that the term impaction is used hereto designate the fact that the anchoring device is driven into thevertebra. It will also be noted that the present application describesan impactor, which is a device for impaction of the anchor because it isarranged to help driving an anchoring device into a vertebra.Furthermore, another potential problem of these types of anchors havinga curved plate concerns its rigidity. In some circumstances, it isimportant that the anchor is rigid enough that it will not deform and/orhave much play under the effects of the forces that are exerted on it,so that it will not gradually come out of the vertebra in which it isembedded. In addition, passage of the anchor through the implant andmaintenance of the stability of such anchor within the implant (subjectto an eventual desired play, for instance minimum play) is also anaspect that is important to ensure reliable mounting in somecircumstances. The application WO2011/080535 also aims at solving thistype of stability problem. These anchoring devices provide a goodanchoring solution with limited invasiveness, but they still require asubstantial size to ensure a good stability in some cases and thus canbe improved to limit the invasiveness even more, in particular forimplantations through the posterior and/or transforaminal pathways. Inaddition, the withdrawal of this type of anchoring device is oftenproblematic, in particular if an easy withdrawal is desired whilepreserving a limited invasiveness.

SUMMARY

Certain embodiments incorporating various technical features describedin the present application therefore aim to alleviate one or more ofthese and/or other disadvantages of the prior art by proposing ananchoring device for intervertebral implants that can be (more) compact(with lesser encumbrance) and (more) easily implantable, especiallyalong an axis substantially perpendicular to the axis of the spine, andthat can be rigid and allow (more) reliable fixation with reduced riskof damaging the vertebrae, in particular for implantations through theposterior and/or transforaminal pathways.

This goal is attained, for example, by a device for anchoringintervertebral implant in the vertebrae according to claim 1 of Frenchpatent application Ser. No. 12/51733.

Other features and advantages are presented in the claims of Frenchpatent application Ser. No. 12/51733 dependent from claim 1 of thatapplication.

Another goal of certain embodiments incorporating various technicalfeatures described in the present application is to alleviate one ormore of said (and/or other) disadvantages of the prior art by proposingan intervertebral implant that can be implanted substantially in theplane of the intervertebral space, which can be attached solidly to thevertebrae by means of an anchoring device that can be implantedsubstantially in the plane of the intervertebral space.

This goal is attained, for example, by an Intervertebral implantaccording to claim 19 of French patent application Ser. No. 12/51733.

Other features and advantages are presented in the claims of Frenchpatent application Ser. No. 12/51733 dependent from claim 19 of thatapplication.

Another goal of certain embodiments incorporating various technicalfeatures described in the present application is to alleviate one ormore of said (and/or other) disadvantages of the prior art by proposingan instrument for implanting intervertebral implants between vertebraeand implanting an anchoring device in at least one of these vertebrae,which allows implanting the implants substantially in the plane of theintervertebral space and implanting an anchoring device along an axis ofapproach substantially in the plane of the intervertebral space.

This goal is attained, for example, by an instrumentation for implantingintervertebral implant between the vertebrae and implanting at least oneanchoring device in at least one of these vertebrae, according to claim28 of French patent application Ser. No. 12/51733.

Other features and advantages are presented in the claims of FrenchPatent application Ser. No. 12/51733 dependent from claim 28 of thatapplication.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING

Other features and advantages of various embodiments of the presentinvention will appear more clearly upon reading the description below,made in reference to the attached drawings, in which:

FIGS. 1A and 1B are respectively a rear view and a perspective view ofsome embodiments of a cage that has two means of anchors and FIGS. 1C,1D and 1E represent, respectively, for a above, a profile view and aperspective view of an anchoring device according to these embodiments;

FIG. 2A shows a perspective view of some embodiments of a cage that hastwo means of anchors, 2B and 2C are respectively a top view and aperspective view of a device anchor according to these embodiments,FIGS. 2D and 2E representing respectively a perspective view and a sideview of other embodiments of the anchor;

FIGS. 3A and 3B show perspective views of various embodiments ofinterbody cages equipped with two anchoring devices and FIGS. 3C, 3D, 3Eand 3F are respectively a perspective view, a side view, a perspectiveview and a side view of various embodiments of anchoring devices;

FIGS. 4A and 4C are views back to different embodiments of interbodycages equipped with two anchoring devices and 4B and 4D are perspectiveviews of various embodiments of anchoring devices;

FIG. 5A shows a rear view of some embodiments of a cage that has twomeans of anchors and 5B and 5C show sectional views along the planes,respectively, 5B and 5C-5B-5C FIG. 5A and FIG. 5D shows a cross-sectionin the plane—5D 5D 5B;

FIGS. 6A and 6B are respectively a side view and a perspective view ofsome embodiments of an anchoring device and FIGS. 6C and 6D showrespectively a side view and a perspective view other embodiments of theanchor;

FIGS. 7A and 7B are respectively a side view and a perspective view ofsome embodiments of a holder for an anchoring device and FIG. 7C shows aside view of a holder with a device anchor according to someembodiments;

FIGS. 8A and 8B are perspective views, respectively, exploded andassembled, certain embodiments of instrumentation for implantation ofinterbody cages and anchoring devices, equipped with one embodiment ofthe cage, holder for anchoring device and an anchoring device, FIG. 8Crepresenting an enlargement of the portion 8C of FIG. 8A;

FIGS. 9A and 9B show respectively a top view and a sectional view alongplane 9B-9B of FIG. 9A, an end to some embodiments of instrumentationfor implantation of interbody cages and anchoring devices, provided withan embodiment of cage, a holder for anchoring device and an anchoringdevice.

DETAILED DESCRIPTIONS

Various embodiments of the invention will now be described in referenceto the figures of the present application. The invention simultaneouslyconcerns three groups of objects:

anchoring devices (1) (or “anchors”), and/or anchoring systemscomprising plural anchoring devices (1) that may be identical,different, or complementary;

intervertebral implants (2) configured for receiving one or more of suchanchoring devices (1) or systems, including but not limited to interbodycages configured for an implantation through the posterior ortransforaminal pathway; and

instruments (3, 4, 5) for implanting implants (2) between the vertebraeand fixing implants with one or more anchoring devices (1) or anchoringsystems.

Each group of objects may comprise various possible embodiments,relating to a given object. Each object comprises various elements(generally constituent of the object) characterized by at least onetechnical feature. Each object (of a given group) concerned by at leastone technical feature might be associated with at least one other object(of the same or another group), for example with respect to at least onecomplementary technical feature, such that the groups of objects share acommon inventive concept. The invention may thus also concern anensemble comprising at least two of these objects, as well as eachobject individually. The elements (for example a plate, a stop, a slit,a chamfer or bevel, etc.) and their technical features (for example acurvature, an orientation, a length, width, height, etc.) are describedin more detail hereafter in the present application. At least onetechnical feature corresponding to an element of a given object solvesat least one technical problem, in particular among those mentioned inthe preamble of the present application. The present application thusdescribes various embodiments and configurations for each object orgroup of objects, by specifying at least one technical feature of atleast one element. It will be understood from reading the presentapplication that the various technical features of each elementdescribed in at least one embodiment or configuration may be isolatedfrom other technical features of the object concerned by (or the objectsconcerned by and/or associated with) said embodiment or configuration(and thus concerning the same or another element) and/or may be combinedwith any other technical feature described herein, in variousembodiments or configurations, unless explicitly stated otherwise, orunless these features are incompatible and/or their combination is notfunctional, in particular because the structural adaptations that may berequired by such isolation or combination of features are directlyderivable from the appreciation of the functional considerationsprovided by the present disclosure. Similarly, although some technicalfeatures are discussed herein in reference to the anchor device, theymay be incorporated in various embodiments of the anchoring systems.Generally speaking, the specific technical feature(s) concerning a givenelement shouldn't be considered as exclusive from those concerninganother element, nor from other technical features concerning the sameelement, except if it clearly appears that the combination of thesetechnical features is impossible or nonfunctional. Although the presentapplication details various embodiments or configurations of theinvention (including preferred embodiments), its spirit and scopeshouldn't be restricted to the examples given.

Various embodiments of anchoring devices (1) in accordance with thepresent invention are usable with intervertebral implants (2), such as,for example, intersomatic cages or intervertebral disc prostheses.Intervertebral implants are designed to be implanted between twoadjacent vertebrae of the vertebral column (spine) or to provide ajunction between two vertebrae, at their periphery in the case ofosteosynthesis plates (which can be used alone or in combination with anintersomatic cage). Anchoring device (1) is designed to be anchored inone of the vertebrae so as to attach the implant to this vertebra.Various embodiments of anchoring devices (1) according to the inventioncomprise at least one curved and rigid plate, configured for penetrationinto a vertebra through an implant and comprise at least one stop tohold this implant against this vertebra. The technical features of“curvature” and “rigidity” concerning the “plate” element of the“anchor” object are described in detail below. Device (1) for anchoringintervertebral implant (2) in the vertebrae will also be referred to inthe present application by the term “anchor” (1), without introducingany limitation whatsoever. This type of anchor has been described inpublications WO 2008/149223 and WO2011/080535 of applications filed bythe assignee of the present application, herein incorporated byreference in their entirety, but the present application concernsimprovements in various structures and methods that may be used invarious deployments to reduce the invasiveness of the surgicalprocedures necessary for the implantation of the implant and anchor. Invarious embodiments, anchor (1) comprises a body including at least onerigid curved plate (10) elongated along a longitudinal axis (L, FIGS. 1Cand 2B). This longitudinal axis (L) of anchor (1) extends between afirst end, which will be referred to as the anterior end, designed topenetrate into a vertebra, and a second end, which will be referred toas the posterior end. Note that the designations of the “posterior” and“anterior” ends of anchor (1), implant (2), and instrument (3, 4, 5) areused in the present application in reference to the direction in whichanchor (1) will be inserted. Thus for anchor (1), the first end(referred to as the anterior end) is the one designed to be insertedfirst and designed to penetrate into a vertebra to affix an implant.Concerning the implant, its wall or end denoted as “posterior” is theone comprising an opening of a passage for the insertion of the anchor,whether this wall is really posterior to the implant or not duringdeployment. In the case of the interbody cages (2) described in thepresent application, this posterior end is generally disposed indeed atthe rear of the patient since these cages are essentially intended foran implantation through the posterior or transforaminal pathway.Concerning the instrument, the anterior end is the one intended to beabutted on (or at least the closest to) the implant during implantation.Certain embodiments of implants (2), including some described in detailin this disclosure and concerning an intersomatic cage, are made fortransforaminal insertion into the disc space, and accordingly theposterior end will be positioned on a lateral and rear side of thevertebrae, while the anterior end will be positioned near the front andopposite lateral slide. Nevertheless, the terms “anterior” and“posterior” will still be used since they are easier to understand fromthe point of view of implantation and may be commonly and convenientlyused with reference to anchor (1), implant (2), and instrument (3, 4, 5)regardless of the implantation approach (implantation path) chosen.Accordingly, the terms “anterior” and posterior” are not intended torefer simply with respect to a patient or an anatomical feature of apatient. Furthermore, the terms “height” and “thickness” are used hereto designate the dimensions of elements according to an orientationparallel to the axis of the spine (when implanted therein) and the terms“superior” and “inferior” are generally also defined according to thisorientation (vertical when the patient is standing upright).Furthermore, the terms “width” and “length” here designate dimensionsalong a plane perpendicular to the axis of the spine (a transverseplane), with the width being generally in the medio-lateral directionwhile the length is in the anteroposterior direction. It will be notedas well that reference is made herein to a longitudinal axis (L) betweenthese two ends and that this longitudinal axis (L) therefore correspondsto a anteroposterior axis of anchor (1) but that this definition is hereextended to the implant (2) and instrument (3, 4, 5), still in referenceto the direction of insertion of the anchor (1). It will also be notedthat the term “substantially” is used several times in the presentdescription, in particular concerning a technical feature such as anorientation or a direction, so as to indicate that the feature concernedmay in fact be slightly different and not exactly as stated (forexample, the expression “substantially perpendicular” should beinterpreted as “at least approximately perpendicular” because it may bepossible to choose an orientation which is not exactly perpendicular forallowing however to serve substantially the same function). Furthermore,the term “substantially” used in the present application may also beinterpreted as defining that the technical feature may “in general”(“generally”), and often “preferably”, as stated, but that otherembodiments or configurations may be within the scope of the presentinvention.

In various embodiments, a bone anchoring device (1) for anintervertebral implant (2) is intended to be inserted, from theperiphery of the spine, through a passage (21) passing through at leasta portion of the implant (2). The device (1) in some embodimentscomprises a body comprising at least one curved, rigid plate (10)elongated along a longitudinal axis (L) extending between a front endand a rear end. The anchoring device (1) (i.e., an anchor) may generallybe formed by the plate (10), without comprising other structuresextending beyond the plate and the elements that the latter comprises.Thus, the anchor may be constituted by at least one plate or may consistof at least one plate in some embodiments. The plate (10) in someembodiments is configured so that its front end enters at least onevertebra while its rear end remains in the passage (21) of the implant(2) or against the edge of the implant (2), thus pressing said implant(2) against said vertebra with at least one stop (e.g., retaining stops14, 140) oriented angularly (i.e., not parallel) to the longitudinalaxis (L) of the plate (10) and pressing against a complementary surface(25) of the implant (2) (e.g., on an edge or in the passage (21) of theimplant). The plate (10) of the anchor (1) of various embodimentsgenerally comprises at least one slot, (slit, gap, cutout, trim, etc.)(11), oriented substantially parallel to its longitudinal axis (L) andseparating at least a rear portion of the plate (10) into two branches(12, 13). Thus, an anchor is obtained in some embodiments which canremain rigid, at least in some directions, but the slot allows the twobranches (12, 13) to be moved bringing the two branches (12, 13) closertogether. Such movement can be obtained by using a material for thebranches (12, 13) having suitable deformation characteristics (e.g.,compromise between rigidity and elasticity), or by use of structures ofthe plate such as a hinge, for example a specific region of each branch(12, 13) having suitable deformation characteristics. Generally, thelength and/or width and/or shape of said slot (11) is (or are)configured to allow approximation of the two branches (12, 13) from eachother, when a pressure is exerted thereon. Preferably, the plate willgenerally be metallic (biocompatible) to provide sufficient rigiditywhile allowing the elastic effect aimed by the slot. However, othermaterials are possible, such as PEEK or other materials suitable forimplantation in the body and for the characteristics necessary for theimplementation of the present invention.

Generally, the anchor (1), comprises, preferably on at least one ofthese branches (12, 13), at least one stop configured for retaining orlocking the anchor (1) in the implant (2). Such retaining or locking ofthe anchor (1) in the implant (2) may be obtained in various embodimentsby different types of latch, lock, stop, etc. In various advantageousembodiments, this retaining or locking is obtained by at least onewithdrawal stop (15, 150), which can be oriented at an angle (i.e., notparallel) to the longitudinal axis (L) of the plate (10) and configuredto cooperate with a complementary surface of the implant (2) and toretain the anchor (1) in the implant (2). Some embodiments of suchwithdrawal stop (15, 150) take advantage of the slot (11), as detailedbelow. In some embodiments, at least one withdrawal stop (15, 150)protrudes or projects from at least one of the branches (12, 13) of thedevice (1), on the side of the branch opposite the side adjacent to theslot (11). In some embodiments, at least one withdrawal stop (15) or atleast one of the withdrawal stops (15, 150), disposed on one branch (12,13) on the side opposite the slot, comprises at least one beveledsurface, oriented generally facing the anterior end of the device (1),so as to form a slope facilitating insertion of the device (1) in theimplant (2) and allowing the branches (12, 13) of the device (1) to begradually brought closer to each other by the contact of this beveled ortapered surface with a wall of the passage (21) in the implant (2).Thus, with at least one withdrawal stop (e.g., 15, 150) on at least oneof the branches (12, 13), the anchor will be retained from spontaneousand unexpected extraction from the implant. In some embodiments with abeveled or tapered surface, the slot (11) can allow the branches tosqueeze together when inserting the anchor into the implant, with thebranches restoring to their rest configuration when the device reaches aposition within the implant where at least one withdrawal stopcooperates with a complementary surface of the implant, such as ahousing in the passage receiving a protruding withdrawal stop forexample (note that these stops are preferably positioned to be withinthe passage or near the passage, rather than the outside of the passage,after its outlet, where this spontaneous deployment of the withdrawalstop may be impeded by osseous tissue). In addition, the slit or slotfacilitates voluntary withdrawal of the anchor by allowing the twobranches to be brought closer to each other and, therefore, thewithdrawal stop (15, 150) to disengage from its complementary lockingsurface of the implant. This arrangement has the advantage that thewithdrawal stop (15, 150) may be smaller than alternative arrangementsof flexible tabs or other structures, and may avoid the use of highlyflexible structures that can be fragile. Moreover, lockingconfigurations can be deployed that do not require too much room aroundthe anchor to permit its removal (e.g., by disengaging the withdrawalstops). Indeed, these types of arrangements may avoid the need forchannels in the implant (2) to access the withdrawal stops (15, 150) ofthe anchor (1) and therefore may permit reducing the size of the implant(2) (in addition to avoiding weakening that may result from usingadditional channels). It is therefore understood that these advantagesof such arrangements generally address the problem of stability offixation of the anchor and, therefore of the implant, and also addressthe problem of invasiveness due to reduced dimensional constraints.

In some embodiments, the anchor (1) comprises at least one grip resource(141) on at least one of the branches (12, 13), configured to engage atool for removing the anchoring device by squeezing the two branches(12, 13) closer to each other to disengage one or more withdrawal stops(15, 150). Engagement of a grip resource with a tool allows, whilebringing the branches closer to each other for releasing the withdrawalstop(s) (15, 150), to pull the anchor and extract it from the implant(for example by pulling on the grip resource). A grip resource can thusenhance removal of the device (1) made possible by the slot (11). Such agrip resource may be formed simply by a housing in the rear end of theanchor, such as at a retaining stop as shown for example in FIGS. 1D and1E. Other grip resources may be used, however, such as a lug or tab(141) projecting from the anchor or a portion of a retaining stop whichis arranged to not be in contact with the implant and thus provide ahousing for the insertion of a tool for pulling on the anchor. Forexample, FIGS. 2B and 2C show an anchor having a projecting tab (141) onthe side edges of each leg (12, 13) of the anchor. As shown for examplein FIG. 2A, this tab (141) does not form a retaining stop as it is notin contact with the surface (25) around the passage (21) of the implant,but another lug or tab (14) is forming a retaining stop. Note that, inother embodiments, such a tab (141) forming a grip resource can alsoform a retaining stop if it has a contact surface with the surface (25)around the passage (21) of the implant (while maintaining a surfacewithout contact with the implant and substantially facing the implant toallow pulling on the anchor and thus form a grip resource).

In some embodiments, the curvature of the plate (10) extends along thethickness of the plate, that is to say that the curvature of the plate(10) defines a concave face (with the inside of the bend extending alongthe upper or lower face of the plate) and a convex face (with theoutside of the bend extending along the opposite face of the plate) ofthe anchor (1), with the two sides (or edges) side of the anchor (1)joining the concave face and the convex face.

In some embodiments, at least one retaining stop (14, 140) comprises atleast one stop surface oriented substantially facing the front end,intended to cooperate with at least one stop surface (25) on the implant(2) that the device (1) is intended to fix, so as to retain and pressthe implant (2) against the vertebra wherein the device (1) is designedto be anchored. For example, the retaining stop (14, 140) may compriseat least one projecting tab on at least one side and/or at least oneedge of the plate (10). Note that the orientations of stops are oftendefined in this application as “angular to” and/or “not parallel to” thelongitudinal axes as it is possible to provide for differentorientations and because the least functional orientation would beparallel to the longitudinal axis as it would not form an abutmentsufficiently effective to restrain movement along the longitudinal axisof the anchor. All other orientations are thus possible but it isgenerally preferred an orientation approximately perpendicular to thelongitudinal axis for greater efficiency. In some embodiments, a singlestop (14 or 140) for retaining may be provided, for example at the rearend of one branch (12, 13) of the plate (10). The retaining stops (14,140) may be disposed anywhere on the plate in a position that results incontact with a surface (not parallel to the longitudinal axis of theanchor) of the implant (2) so as to press the implant (2) against thevertebra (i.e., anywhere along passage (21) before its outlet on theupper or lower surface of the implant). FIGS. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D and 1E showillustrative and non-restrictive examples in which each branch has aretaining stop (14). Preferably, at least one stop is disposed at therear end of the anchor so as to avoid the need for providing acomplementary surface for receiving the stop that is within the passageof the implant. These stops can be formed, for example, by lugs, tabs,studs or other forms of projections extending from a face or edge of theplate. In these examples of FIG. 1, these stops are formed by a smallprojecting lug (14) on the concave face of the anchor, but it could bethe convex face although the concave face is generally preferred so asnot to hinder the impaction of a second anchor and/or so as to leaveroom for the stops of a second anchor fixing the implant to the othervertebra. In addition, provision may be made for at least one retainingstop (140) on at least one (or more) lateral edge(s) of the anchorrather than on one (or more) face(s). Both layouts or arrangements canalso be provided at the same time. For example, in FIGS. 2B and 2C, afirst type of retaining stop (14) is arranged on one side of the anchor(on each of two branches in these non-limiting examples) and a secondtype of retaining stop (140) is obtained by a structure projecting on atleast one lateral edge of the plate (on a side edge of each of the twobranches in these non-limiting examples).

In some embodiments, illustrative and not limiting examples of which areshown in FIGS. 6A, 6B, 6C and 6D, a slot (11) separates the plate (10)in its thickness. This produces a slotted plate (10) with a branch (12)on the concave face and a branch (13) on the convex face. In some ofthese embodiments, one of the two branches (12, 13) comprises at leastone withdrawal stop (15, 150) while in other embodiments each of the twobranches may comprise at least one withdrawal stop (15). In someembodiments having a withdrawal stop (15) on a single face, it is thebranch (13) of the convex face which comprises at least one withdrawalstop (15), such as shown in FIGS. 6A and 6B, while in other embodimentsit is the branch (12) of the concave face which comprises at least onewithdrawal stop (15), such as shown in FIGS. 6C and 6D.

In some embodiments, at least one slot (11) separates a plate (10) inits width. This gives a branch (12, 13) on each of two lateral faces ofthe plate (10). In some embodiments, there is provided a combination ofthese two possible orientations of the slot. In such embodiments, alongitudinal slot separates the plate in its width, but not over itsentire thickness and a longitudinal slot separates a rear portion of theplate in its thickness. One thus obtains a portion of the anchor splitin its width where one plate (19) stiffens the rear of the anchor, forexample as shown in FIGS. 2D and 2E. Preferably, in these embodimentswith at least one slot splitting the plate in its width, each of the twobranches comprises at least one withdrawal stop (15, 150), such as shownin most of the figures showing anchors with two lateral branches. Insome embodiments, each branch may comprise several withdrawal stops (15,150), preferably with at least one beveled surface on the one (or those)which is (are) the closest to the front end. For example, FIGS. 2B and2C show a non-limiting illustrative example of such an anchor thatincludes a first withdrawal stop (15) and a second withdrawal stop (150)disposed a little more posterior than the first. The implant thenpreferably has a second surface complementary to this second stop andoriented to prevent the backing out of the anchor from the implant(i.e., with an orientation angular (not parallel) to the longitudinalaxis of the anchor and preferably perpendicular), for example as shownin FIG. 5D. Note that the second withdrawal stop (150) may be obtainedby a structure (a bulge for example) which may also form a retainingstop (140), as defined in this application by reference to the retainingstops (14, 140) since its anterior surface (according to namingconvention defined in the this application) has a surface angular (notparallel) to the longitudinal axis and located on the side towards thefront end (preferably substantially facing the front end) of the plateand adapted to oppose the advance of the anchor in the implant if it hasa complementary surface to receive or abut it, for example as shown inFIG. 5D. This second withdrawal stop (150), cooperating with such acomplementary surface of the implant is able to hold the implant in thesame way (achieve substantially the same function) as the retainingstops (14, 140) defined in this application. However, some embodimentsof the retaining stops (14, 140) defined in this application aredisposed closer to the posterior end of the anchor and thus have theadvantage of providing a retaining stop without the need forcomplementary surface within the passage (21) of the implant (2) (i.e.,without the need for housing along the walls of the passage to allowaccommodation of a bearing surface for the stop, which is relativelydifficult to manufacture). Also, some embodiments of the retaining stops(14, 140) defined in this application are disposed on the face ratherthan the edge of the anchor and thus have the advantage of providing aretaining stop (14) which stops the anchor even though its branches areclose to each other. It is therefore generally preferred to provide atleast one retaining stop (14, 140) for the anchor, although it maycontain several withdrawal stops (15, 150) with at least one (150) beingcapable of forming a retaining stop by the fact that it comprises anabutment surface towards the front end. Note that providing retainingstops (14) on the concave and/or convex face of the anchor split in itswidth (or conversely a stop on an edge of an anchor split in itsthickness) allow to stop the anchor even if its branches (12, 13) aremoved towards one another, which would not necessarily be the case forwithdrawal stops (140) on the side edges that are eventually, dependingon their length, capable of forming a retaining stop only if thebranches are in the rest position, that is to say at a distance fromeach other (and pose a risk that the anchor penetrates too far into theimplant and is stuck with its branches close to each other and theirside stops inside the passage). However, the implantation generally usesan instrumentation preventing the anchor from penetrating too deep inthe implant (and preventing the retaining stop to be inserted in thepassage in various configurations). Indeed, the impactor describedhereafter is generally configured with a stop surface preventing frompushing the anchor too deep and adjusted or adjustable as a function ofthe shape and/or dimensions of the anchor and/or implant. Furthermore,preference may also be for the lateral retaining stops (140) becausethey may reduce the space needed above and below the anchors unlike thestops (14) arranged on at least one face (concave and/or convex), inparticular because it is sometimes possible to provide lateral retainingstops (140) which are long enough to function even when the branches aremoved towards each other (to prevent the anchor from penetrating too farinto the implant). In other configurations, for example those of theinterbody cages intended for implantation through the posterior ortransforaminal pathway, the approach imposes constraints on the width ofthe implant and therefore the retaining stops (e.g. 14, 140) arepreferably protruding from the faces (convex and/or concave) of theanchor, so as not to require enlarging the width, in particular when atleast one grip resource (26, 27) is provided near the passage (in thevicinity or on the lateral faces of the implant). Depending on theconfiguration and direction in which congestion is the most troublesome,it is possible to choose the most suitable locations and/or shapes stopsto minimize the size (in height and/or in width) of the elements(components) and the objects (and thus the invasiveness), while ensuringa reliable device.

Using at least one plate (10) allows anchor (1) to ensure a good hold,at least in a direction substantially perpendicular to the plate, sincethe width of the plate offers a surface opposing movement of the anchorand thus of the implant (perpendicularly to this surface) in the bonetissue in which it is implanted. It will be noted that when the plate iscurved, this hold is created along at least one direction substantiallyradial to the radius of curvature of the plate. In fact, variousembodiments of the present invention, like various embodiments of theone described in the applications cited above, have the advantage of ahaving curvature that allows it to be implanted in the vertebralendplate of a vertebra along an approach axis substantiallyperpendicular to the axis of the spine at the level of the vertebraebetween which the implant is implanted (or in the plane of theintervertebral space), which may facilitate implantation and allowavoiding some of the disadvantages linked to the encumbrance(dimensions) of the approach to the vertebrae by minimizing theinvasiveness of the surgical approach to the intervertebral space neededto implant the anchor. Thus, the curved plate (10) of the bodypreferably describes at least one circular or elliptic arc havingdimensions and at least one radius of curvature arranged such that theanchoring device (1) can be implanted in an endplate along an approachaxis forming an angle of approximately 90° with the axis of the spine,by presenting the anchor's longitudinal axis (L) substantially in theplane of the intervertebral space. It is understood that variousembodiments of the anchor are designed to penetrate from the peripheryof the disc space into the vertebrae, preferably into the inferiorvertebral endplate of the upper vertebra or into the superior vertebralendplate of the lower vertebra, in particular in the case of implantssuch as intersomatic cages or intervertebral disc prosthesis. Also,other embodiments of the anchor may be configured for implantationpreferably into the periphery of the vertebral body near theintervertebral space, especially in the case of intervertebral implantssuch as osteosynthesis plates. When an anchor is intended forimplantation into the vertebral plate, for example through implants suchas intersomatic cages or intervertebral disc prosthesis, the curvatureof the anchor is preferably configured so that, once embedded in avertebra, the axis of the spine is substantially tangential to asubstantial part of its anterior extremity, or at least that this partof the anterior end forms a small (or slight) angle with the verticalaxis of the spine.

In various embodiments the anchor advantageously has the shape of aplate which may be relatively thin, facilitating the penetration ofanchor (1) into the bone tissue. This thinness of plate (10) may pose aproblem of stability of anchor (1) in the vertebra, to the extent thatthe plate might form a sort of blade that can split the vertebra in adirection along the width of the plate (transversely to longitudinalaxis (L) of various embodiments), notably during its impaction in thevertebra, or later, due to the significant stress applied thereon whenthe patient moves, for example. Furthermore, this thinness may diminishthe rigidity of the plate. In some applications rigidity may be animportant feature for effective fixation, resulting in embodimentsparticularly more effective than staples or other thin and/or relativelyflexible, often fragile, devices, which do not allow a good hold due totheir flexibility and/or thinness and/or their fragility. Therefore,rigid anchors are preferred for many embodiments (curved anchors beingalso preferred, but for facilitating the approach to vertebrae), insteadof deformable anchors. Rigid anchors penetrate into the vertebraethrough a passage (21) crossing at least a part of the implant withoutbeing deformed in this passage (21). For these rigid embodiments, innerwalls of this passage (21) in the implant preferably have shapes anddimensions that allow the anchor to pass: either by a curvaturecomplementary to that of the anchor, or by an uncurved shape with aheight slightly greater than that of the anchor to permit its passagedespite its curvature and rigidity (thus avoiding machining a curvedpassage in the implant, which may be complex and costly).

Various embodiments of the present invention resolve problems ofstability and rigidity of anchor (1) by using at least one longitudinalrib over at least one part of at least one of the faces of the body ofanchor (1). This longitudinal rib preferably is orientated in thedirection of the length of plate (10), substantially parallel tolongitudinal axis (L) in various embodiments, for example such asdescribed in application WO2011/080535 owned by the assignee of thepresent application. However, as the anchor is provided with a slot (11)on at least a rear portion, the rib will be preferably on a portion ofthe anchor which is not split, thus on a front portion of the anchor.

Moreover, it is generally preferred to solve, in various embodiments ofthe present invention, any eventual stability problems by means,resources, arrangements or configurations other than a rib, because arib generally will impose size constraints on the implant (whichtypically will have a groove to accommodate the rib), while many of thepresent embodiments generally aim to minimize the invasiveness and thusthe size of elements (items) and objects of the invention. Some of theseother configurations to solve the problem of potential instability ofthe anchor may for example include a bone growth through the anchor tostabilize it (although it requires time for growth to take place) and/orprovide an anchor of sufficient thickness and with lateral edges softenough (i.e., not sharp) to avoid splitting the vertebrae. In addition,using a sufficiently rigid material may provide good stability despitethe absence of rib and the presence of a slot, while maintaining a sizewhich still limits the invasiveness. Indeed, using appropriateconfigurations of a slot can allow making the posterior portion of theanchor flexible enough for the release of the withdrawal stops, butallow keeping the anchor very rigid overall, because the stops can beconfigured very small in size relative to the rest of the anchor. Inaddition, the compromise between the flexibility of the two branches andthe overall rigidity of the anchor may be controlled with appropriateconfigurations of the shapes and dimensions of the slot and/or thebranches.

In some embodiments, the plate (10) defines, by its curvature, anaverage arc (AM, FIGS. 3D and 3E) between its front and rear ends, andhas two arms (12, 13) which are offset with respect to each other onopposite sides of the average arc (AM). FIGS. 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E and 3Fshow illustrative and not limiting examples of such a configuration ofthe branches of the anchors (and associated examples of embodiments ofimplants in FIGS. 3A and 3B). In these embodiments, the two arms areoffset and can be brought closer to each other so that one comes oneabove the other. This arrangement reduces the width of the slot requiredfor the approximation of the branches and may limit the overall width ofthe anchor. On the other hand, this arrangement, by providing brancheswhich are offset, provides a larger contact surface of the anchor,laterally to the plate, with the bone of the vertebra, and therefore agreater resistance allowing to reduce the risk of cutting the bone by alateral movement of the anchor in the bone. This type of arrangement ofanchor (1) with offset branches usually requires adapting the shape anddimensions of the passage (21) in the implant, as detailed below.Indeed, such anchors with offset branches often require that the passageis enlarged. However, in some embodiments, which FIGS. 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D,3E and 3F illustrate non-limiting examples, the anchor (1) is arrangedso that it is not necessary to enlarge passage (21) of the implant (2)too much to allow the insertion of the anchor (1). Indeed, in theseembodiments, the anterior portion of the anchor which is not splitcomprises two portions, each in the extension of one of the branches,which are also offset with respect to each other (in the same directionas the branches). This offset provides the anterior part of the anchor(1) a form adapted to the shape of the passage (21) of the implant (2)which is necessary to retain the posterior part of the anchor (1). Thus,the passage (21) may be adjusted to the posterior part of the anchor (1)and the front part adapted to the passage (21). Note that the passagepreferably still has a central portion adapted to pass the part formingthe offset between the two anterior sections. Other simpler solutionsare possible even if they do not usually allow obtaining a passage aswell adjusted (and retaining the anchor as best as possible). Forexample, it is possible to thin-down an anterior portion of the anchorfor it to pass more easily through the passage without enlarging thepassage too much, but the passage should then still contain a portionadapted to pass an anterior portion of the anchor shaped as a platesubstantially tangent (or parallel) to the average arc (AM), while thebranches are offset with respect to this average arc. Note that theoffset of the branches and of the anterior portions is more importanttoward their posterior end than toward the anterior end. Therefore, insuch embodiments, at least one of the branches preferably comprises, onthe edge adjacent the slot, preferably at least near the front end ofthe slot, at least one bevel surface or chamfer to avoid an eventualfriction of the two branches when they are brought closer together.Alternatively or additionally, it is possible to widen the slot at itsfront end to prevent contact between the branches.

In some embodiments, the two arms (12, 13) have shapes that arecomplementary to one another, configured so that at least one rearportion of one of the branches (e.g., 12, 13) can cover at least onerear portion of another of the branches (e.g., 12, 13), at leastpartially, without increasing the total thickness of the device, whenthe two branches are brought close to each other. FIGS. 4A and 4B showillustrative and not limiting examples of such a configuration of thebranches of the anchors (and associated exemplary embodiments ofimplants in FIG. 4A). This arrangement reduces the width of the slotrequired for the approximation of the branches and may limit the overallwidth of the anchor. In some embodiments the branches may actually atleast partially overlap at rest, which allows to reduce the overallwidth of the anchor. Furthermore, some of these arrangement, byproviding for branches that are not symmetrical but complementary, mayprovide for bone ingrowth, for example thanks to housing provided by thecomplementarity of shape of the branches, and which may quickly providea way to limit the risk of cutting the bone by a lateral displacement ofthe anchor in the bone.

In some embodiments, at least one slot (11) may be formed in thethickness of the plate (10) but not in a plane perpendicular to thewidth of the plate (10). In some embodiments, a slot (11) may deviatepartially or totally from the longitudinal axis describing a curvature.FIGS. 4C and 4D show illustrative and not limiting examples of acombination of these independently deployable aspects of embodiments ofslots (11) of an anchor (and an exemplary embodiment of an associatedimplant in FIG. 4C). Indeed, in these figures, the slot has an obliqueorientation in the thickness of the plate (it does not crossperpendicularly). Furthermore, the slot is curved in the length of theplate. Although presented in combination in this figure, it will beunderstood that one can separate these two features and provide ananchor such as in FIG. 4B, but with an oblique slot facilitating theapproximation of two branches in an extreme position. In addition, inthese examples, the curvature of the slot deviates from the longitudinalaxis (L) towards a lateral edge of the anchor. In other examples, theslot may describe a curvature substantially centered on the longitudinalaxis (L). Using a curvature deviating toward an edge of the anchor, oneobtains an anchor with a branch (13) more flexible than the other branch(12), which may be advantageous in some configurations. For example, thewithdrawal stop(s) (15) may then be provided only on this branch (13)more flexible than the other, so as to facilitate the disengagement ofthe withdrawal stop(s) (15) when the anchor is desired to be removed.Furthermore, the branch (12) which is less flexible than the other mayprovide for a better overall rigidity of the anchor.

Various embodiments of anchors with regard to the length of the anchoritself and/or the length of the slot (11) are possible. Indeed, anchorsof different lengths (and different curvatures) may be provided for amore or less deep anchoring depending on the application. In addition,as mentioned above, the length and/or width and/or shape of said slot(11) is (or are) configured to allow approximation of the two branches(12, 13) together, when pressure is exerted thereon. In someembodiments, the length of slot (11) is preferably at least greater thanthe width (or to a quarter of the length) of the device (1). It is evengenerally preferred that the length of the slot (11) is greater than thethird of the length, or even half of the plate (10) to facilitate theapproximation of two branches. However, a compromise is generallyreached between the various parameters which may impact on the risks ofweakening the anchor or making it too flexible, such as for example thelength of the slot (which may not depend on the length of the plate),the width of the slot, the section of the plate (dimensions in heightand/or thickness), the size of the anterior end not split, etc. Also,the width of the slot may vary depending on the application, andembodiments may be used where the width of said slot (11) varies alongthe longitudinal axis (L) of the plate (10). For example, FIG. 1C showsa slot whose width is greater at the rear end than at the front end. Itis not necessary, indeed, that the slot is very wide at its front end asthe approximation of the branches typically is desired mostly at theposterior end of the anchor. In some embodiments, for example if theplate has a width such that it is not possible (or too difficult) toobtain an approximation of the branches with a single longitudinal slot,the slot may have a more complex shape, adapted to allow theapproximation of the branches (for example a T-shape or any othersuitable configuration). It is also possible to arrange a plurality ofslots (11), of various shapes, in the plate (10) if necessary. Inaddition, the slot can optionally allow bone growth through the plate(10), which stabilizes the anchor (and therefore the implant).Embodiments are therefore provided for where the slot is wide or flared(e.g., portion 17) at its front end, to facilitate bone growth throughthe anchor. One can also provide, in addition to the slot, at least onehole passing through the thickness of the plate (10) to allow bonegrowth through the device (1) once implanted.

In various embodiments, the front end of the slot (11) is provided witha portion (17) configured to prevent the plate from splitting in theextension of the slot under the effect of stress on the anchor. Such aportion (17) may for example be rounded such as shown in FIG. 1C, but itis sufficient to provide a surface may not parallel to the longitudinalaxis (preferably perpendicular) to reduce the possibility of shear orsplitting.

The present invention is not limited regarding the number or positionsof the anchors deployed, although certain configurations areparticularly advantageous, notably in terms of resistance or size of theimplant, for example, in the case of the cervical implant, where thesmall size places strong constraints on the size and where the strengthof the materials requires that the implants not be made excessivelyfragile by passages (21), especially in the case of intersomatic cagesmade of PEEK (polyether ether ketone).

In various anchor and anchor system embodiments of the invention, plate(10) can be substantially rectangular, as is shown in many of thefigures, but can, of course, have various other shapes without departingfrom the spirit of the invention. Preferably, whatever the shape of theperiphery of the plate, it presents at least one surface of sufficientdimension for efficiently opposing its movements in the vertebra,contrarily to staples, nails or other known devices. For example, mostof the plates shown in the figures have a substantially rectangularperiphery, but have variations in shape described in detail in thepresent application. Moreover, anchor (1) can comprise several plates,and/or a single plate of the body can have various shapes withoutdeparting from the spirit of the invention. In fact, to the extent thatthe desired hold can be obtained by at least one plate offering at leastone surface sufficient in the dimension described here as the width ofthe plate, the anchor can comprise plates having a substantiallytrapezoidal or triangular periphery or having diverse shape variations.For example, in certain variants of anchor (1) (not shown), the body ofanchoring device (1) may have two plates substantially parallel to oneanother (and/or with substantially the same curvature) and connectedtogether at the posterior end, for example, such as described inpublications FR 2,827,156 (and WO 03/005939 and US 2004/0199254) and FR2,879,436 (and WO 2006/120505 and US 2006/0136063), each of which isincorporated herein by reference, which may form a stop holding anchor(1) on the implant and thus holding the implant against the vertebra. Inaddition, various embodiments of anchors (1) may comprise at least onestraight plate, for example such as described in these publications, orcomprise 2 straight plates connected by a link able to, or configuredto, form a stop allowing to affix the implant. Generally, various anchorembodiments of the invention may use a slot (11) to allow bringing thebranches close to each other and this slot may achieve its function evenif the branches in fact form the rear end of double plate.

Various embodiments of the invention strive to reduce the size of thedevices and associated instruments, so as to allow implanting theanchoring device along an axis substantially in the plane of theintervertebral space (disc space). As described in publications ofapplications WO 2008/149223 and WO2011/080535 cited above andincorporated herein by reference, curved plate (10) describes, along thelongitudinal axis, at least one arc of a circle and/or at least one arcof an ellipse whose dimensions and radii of curvature are created sothat anchoring device (1) can be implanted in the vertebral endplate ofa vertebra by having its perpendicular axis substantially in the planeof the intervertebral space, i.e., along an axis of approachsubstantially perpendicular to the axis of the spine (i.e., said planeor said approach axis being substantially tangential to at least part ofthe anterior end when the anchor approaches the vertebrae). Similarly tothe above cited applications, various embodiments of the various objectsof the present invention concern the technical feature of the radius (orradii) of curvature of anchoring device (1). Various embodiments ofanchoring device (1) in fact have a different radius of curvature fromone anchor to another, and/or several different radii of curvature ondifferent portions of the body of a given anchor (1). Thus, for example,the body of anchor (1) may have an arc of a circle or arc of an ellipseshape, but it may also describe a more complex curvature, as if severalarc(s) of a circle, having a same radius of curvature or different radiiof curvature, were placed end to end or if several arc(s) of an ellipse,having a same radius of curvature or different radii of curvature, wereplaced end to end, or any combination of arcs of a circle or ellipse oreven a radius of curvature that varies along the body. In the presentdescription, the terms “arc of a circle” or “radius of curvature”encompass all these different possibilities. Thus, various embodimentsof the present invention provide different variants concerning theradius of curvature and certain related aspects of anchoring device (1),as well as implants (2) and instruments (3, 4) that may be associatedwith it. In fact, for example, depending on the use of device (1) and inparticular its intended implantation location along the spine, it may bepreferable to have a larger or smaller radius of curvature. Depending onthe radius of curvature of anchoring device (1), the axes passing,respectively, through the penetration end and the stop end of device (1)form an angle, typically comprised between approximately 90° and 180°,although it may also be chosen to be less than 90°. Preferably, thisangle will be comprised between 110° and 160°, which, in manycircumstances, will facilitate implanting the device better than anangle outside these values. According to the fixation that one wishes toobtain by means of anchoring device (1), the angle will be selected tobe more or less open. If one wishes, for example, to promote tightaffixation of the cage or the prosthesis against the vertebral endplate,an angle comprised between 120° and 180° may be preferred, while if onewishes rather to prevent the implant from moving in the plane of thedisc space, an angle comprised between 90° and 150° may be preferred.Although these angle variations are not shown in the figures, differentangles for anchoring device (1) permit covering the different desirabletypes of anchoring in order to assure a fixation of the implants that isadapted to the case. A device (1) whose angle is at an optimal value,for example near 135°, can also be provided in one of the preferredembodiments for fixation of the device both by pressing the implanttight against the vertebral endplates and preventing it from moving inthe plane of the disc space. Moreover, according to the variousembodiments of implant (2), different angles can be chosen for thedevice, particularly to permit a good fixation despite possiblelordosis, kyphosis, or even scoliosis, whether it be natural,pathological, or imposed by the implant. Thus, various embodiments ofanchoring device (1) and of implant (2), by means of its radius ofcurvature and the orientation of passage (21) into which it will beinserted, can be implanted along an axis of approach substantially inthe plane of the intervertebral space, i.e., the plane in which implant(2) is implanted, which facilitates the approach of all the elements ofthe implant and the device to the intervertebral space. In oneembodiment, the arc (or arcs) described by the body of anchor (1) has(or have) dimensions and at least one radius of curvature so thatanchoring device (1) can be implanted in a vertebral endplate along anaxis of approach forming an angle comprised between 40° and 140° withthe vertical axis of the spine and, preferably, an approximately 90°angle. This angle can vary for a same anchoring device (1) depending onthe dimensions of the approaches to the vertebra and can also vary fromone anchoring device (1) to the other depending on the radius ofcurvature of device (1) used (and therefore the angle formed between itsanterior and posterior ends). Furthermore, various embodiments providefor an anchor (1) comprising at least one straight (uncurved) plate(10). Note that in the case of straight anchors (1) (i.e., comprising atleast one straight plate), the approach axis may preferably not besubstantially in the plane of the disc space but may be oblique. Thistype of oblique axis is not generally preferred because of theencumbrance of the access to vertebrae but it is still possible to usein some circumstances. The implants (2) used with such straight anchors(1) preferably comprise at least one straight passage (21), orientedtoward at least one vertebra, along an oblique path (not perpendicularto the axis of the spine) between the periphery of the spine and thevertebrae. The instrumentation used with such implants (2) with straightpassages and such straight anchors (1) preferably will have a contactsurface with the implant, at the anterior end, inclined with respect toits longitudinal axis (antero-posterior according to the convention usedin the present application), so as to allow an oblique approach axisrelative to the vertebrae. Furthermore, various embodiments of anchor(1) may also have a body comprising at least two straight plates (10)(or plate portions) forming an angle between each other. These straightplates (10) (or plate portions) may for example be linked by at leastone connective portion forming such angle (for example thanks to acurvature of this connective portion). These various embodiments may forexample be used in association with implants (2) comprising a curvedpassage (21), for example so as to facilitate the passage of anchor (1)and/or assure a minimum play of anchor (1) within the implant (2),thanks to contact of various parts or portions of the anchor (1) withvarious parts or portions of inner walls of the passage (21). Variousembodiments of anchor (1) may also have a body comprising at least onestraight plate (10) (or plate portion) and at least one curved plate(10) (or plate portion). These various configurations of the body ofanchor (1) allow providing various embodiments of potential objects ofthe invention, concerning anchors comprising various portions. Theseparticular objects can be configured to solve the problem(s) offacilitating the passage of anchor (1) through the implant (2) and/or toimprove the stability of anchor (1) within the implant (2) and/or limitthe invasiveness. Anchoring systems (and associated implants andinstrument) are also provided for, in which various embodiments of theanchors and features described herein and in applications etWO2008/19223 and WO2011/080535 may be combined. These particular objects(e.g., any of these embodiments comprising at least one straight and/orcurved plate (or plate portion) in their body) may also comprise or not,according to various embodiments, any technical feature (or combinationof technical features) described for any element (or combination ofelements) of any object (or combination of objects) disclosed in thisapplication, as long as they are not incompatible, in particular becausethe structural adaptations that may be required by such isolation orcombination of features are directly derivable from the appreciation ofthe present disclosure.

Anchoring device (1) generally cooperates with at least one passage (21)crossing through a portion of the implant that it is intended to affix.Such a passage can be a conduit or a channel, for example, of shapes andsizes arranged for the passage of the anchoring device, particularly incross-section (for example, a substantially rectangular cross-sectionwith rounded angles). Preferably, passage (21) is straight, so as tofacilitate its machining, and its dimensions are arranged for thepassage of a curved and rigid anchoring device (1) without requiringdeformation of this device regardless of its radius of curvature. Invarious embodiments in which anchor (1) is curved, the height (of theopening) of the passage is therefore preferably slightly greater thanthe thickness of anchoring device (1), sufficiently to allow the passageof this device inside passage (21), without deformation regardless ofits curvature and its rigidity, but sufficiently small to assure a goodretention of implant (2) by anchoring device (1), without too much playof the device inside passage (21). In certain embodiments of theinvention, the width of passage (21) can be substantially equal to thewidth of device (1) so that this device has little or no lateral playonce it is inserted into passage (21). The length of anchoring device(1) may be adapted to the length of passage (21) to be crossed and thedepth to which it must penetrate in the vertebral endplates.

In some configurations, the anterior end of anchor (1) is designed topenetrate into a vertebra adjacent to the implantation's location of theimplant (2) to be affixed. In certain embodiments of anchor (1), forexample as shown in FIG. 1, the anterior end has at least one chamfer(18) or a bevel facilitating the penetration of anchor (1) into thevertebra. In some embodiments, this anterior end can comprise a cutout,for example in the form of a notch, facilitating the penetration of theanterior end into the vertebral endplates. Also note that the inneredges of the notch may or may not be sharpened. Generally, since theanterior end is the one designed to penetrate into the vertebralendplate and may guide the rest of anchor (1), it is preferred that itbe made so as to facilitate penetration into the bone tissue. In certainembodiments, this anterior end may thus comprise at least one point.Thus, the figures of the present application show an anterior endconfigured substantially into the shape of a point (as further explainedelsewhere in this disclosure). It is understood that this end can besharpened (or ground), but that since bone tissue can be relativelyresistant, it is preferable to preserve the integrity of this anteriorend. Thus, as can be particularly seen in FIG. 1, for example, theanterior end preferably has a chamfer on each of the faces of plate (10)and the lateral sides of the plate are beveled so as to reduce the widthof the anterior end. Preferably, these bevels terminate at a distancefrom one another and the anterior end is therefore terminated by a planeor curved surface which is relatively sharp. On the other hand, aspreviously mentioned, it is preferable for anchor (1) to penetrateeasily into the vertebrae without risking splitting them beyond thedimensions of anchor (1). Thus the lateral sides (or edges) of plate(10) (of the body in general) will preferably be flat, as shown in mostof the figures. Hence, in general, the lateral sides of the plate (10)of the anchor (1) preferably are flat, so as to avoid splitting thevertebrae.

As mentioned above, so as to enhance an anchor's ability to hold animplant (2) against a vertebra, various embodiments provide for it to bestopped against at least one surface of the implant that it is intendedto affix, so as to hold the implant against the vertebral endplate,preferably firmly pressed against it. In various embodiment of anchoringdevice (1), the body accordingly comprises at least one retaining stop(14). Retaining stop (14) preferably has at least one stop surfaceoriented facing the anterior end. Preferably, this surface is orientedapproximately perpendicular to the longitudinal axis and is facing theanterior end, whether it is positioned at the posterior end or furthertowards the front. This retaining stop (14) is designed to cooperatewith at least one stop surface of a complementary stop (25) provided onimplant (2) that device (1) is designed to affix, in order to holdimplant (2) against the vertebra in which anchoring device (1) isdesigned to be anchored. In various embodiments, stop (25) preferablycomprises at least one stop surface oriented facing the posterior end(i.e., toward the periphery of the implant), in order to cooperateoptimally with retaining stop (14). These cooperating stop surfaces canhave various configurations, for example, flat, curved, prismatic, andso on. Note that retaining stop (14) is preferably at the posterior end,as most of the figures of the present application show. In manyconfigurations, retaining stop (14) is positioned at the level of (i.e.,at or in the vicinity of) the posterior end so that it is located at, ornear to, the entrance to passage (21) in the implant, abutting thecomplementary surface of stop (25) of the implant. This surface of thecomplementary stop (25) may, for example, be a surface of the peripheralwall of the implant, but it may preferably be formed by a recess, sothat stop (14) doesn't protrude from (or extend beyond) the implant whenanchor (1) is fully inserted therein. Furthermore, it is understood thatstop (14) can be further toward the front of the anchor, so that it canbe found inside passage (21), for example, as long as a complementarystop surface (25) of the implant is suitably positioned. The position ofretaining stop (14) at the level of the posterior end, however, in manyembodiments has the advantage of offering a good hold of the implant,particularly when the anchor is configured to contact the implant fromthe entrance of the passage up to the outlet. In addition, thisposterior position may be preferred when configuring the implant (2) andthe anchor (1) to facilitate an intentional withdrawal of the anchor, asdiscussed for various configurations elsewhere in this disclosure.

In certain embodiments of anchor (1), retaining stop (14) comprises atleast one part protruding from at least one of the faces and/or sides(or edges) of the anchor (1). For example, the retaining stop (14) maycomprise at least one projecting lug. For example, retaining stop (14)comprises two projecting lugs on a same face of anchoring device (1), inparticular the convex face. In other configurations, at least oneprojecting lug can be provided on any face and/or sides (or edges), orat least one lug can be provided on each face and/or sides (or edges),or there can be any other variant in the same spirit. In certainembodiments of anchor (1), retaining stop (14) comprises at least oneprojecting lug on at least one lateral side or edge of the body ofanchoring device (1). Preferably, at least one lug will be positioned oneach of the 2 lateral sides, so as to improve the hold, As these exampleconfigurations of retaining stop (14) show, the term “projecting lug”used here should not be interpreted in a limiting manner, and theprecise form of the lug can vary, for example between a small plateoffering planar stop surfaces and a small stud offering curved stopsurfaces, or any other variant, although some particular shapes may havevarious advantages, for example in terms of an efficient hold or of avoluntary withdrawal of the anchor. In addition, retaining stop (14) canhave various orientations, so as to hold anchor (1) in the implant andhold the implant tight against the vertebra in an optimal manner.Several different retaining stops (14) can also be provided, positionedat different places on anchor (1). In some embodiments of anchor (1) andimplant (2), the shapes of retaining stop (14) and complementary stop(25) can be arranged so that stop (14) of the anchor is mated with orlocked to stop (25) of the implant, for example by locking lugs engaginga recess. In the case of anchors (1) with two curved plates connected byan uncurved portion or in the case of a single plate with a curvedportion (hook-shaped, such as in publications FR 2,879,436, WO2006/120505 and US 2006/0136063, each of which is incorporated herein byreference, particularly in the case of fixation of prostheses), thisportion can serve as a retaining stop, cooperating with a shaft or atleast one surface situated at the entrance of passage (21), for example.Anchoring device (1) is removable in numerous embodiments and can beimplanted in the vertebrae and mated with the implant after it isinstalled between the vertebrae, which allows possible adjustment of theposition of the implant between the vertebrae before definitive fixationby anchor (1). In some embodiments, the retaining stop can be used topull the anchor (1) to remove it from the vertebrae, and the implant ifnecessary (e.g., in the case of a curved hook or a grip resource (141)providing a way to pull on the anchor as mentioned above).

It should be noted that the withdrawal stops may be positioned atvarious locations on the plate (10) (at least on one side and/or atleast one edge and at various positions along the longitudinal axis).Preferably, these withdrawal stops (15) will not be disposed so close tothe posterior end that a deep recess realized (spared) from the outletof passage (21) to form complementary surfaces receiving these stops(15) is required. Depending on the position of the withdrawal stops(15), these complementary surfaces may be formed in various places onthe implant. For example, in the case of withdrawal stops (15) close tothe posterior end, the complementary surfaces may be formed by recesses,created in a wall of passage (21), for example near the lateral sides ofthe passage. Withdrawal stops (15) disposed further from the posteriorend can engage a surface outside the passage (at its outlet), but moreposterior stops are preferred because bringing the branches close toeach other will allow a disengagement more easily with such stops thanwith stops further away from the posterior end.

In certain embodiments of anchor (1), the body may be configured withnotches (16) oriented to oppose the withdrawal of device (1) once it isimplanted in a vertebra. Preferably, these notches will be present onlyalong the portion of the body of anchor (1) that is designed to emergefrom the passage when the anchor is fully inserted in the implant. Ascan be particularly seen from the non-limiting examples shown in FIGS.1C, 2C and 6B, these notches (16) can vary in number, size and shape.Such notches serve to stabilize the anchor into the bone and prevent theanchor from withdrawing from the bone, especially when bone growth hasfilled the space between the notches. In some embodiments of the anchor(1), it can be provided, near the rear end of the plate (10), for atleast one portion of thickness greater than the thickness of the rest ofthe plate (10), limiting the clearance of the device in the passage (21)of the implant (2).

In certain embodiments, the ability to readily withdraw the anchor ispreferred, and in those embodiments notches (16) or structures allowinggrowth of bone through the anchors, such as holes or enlarged slotswould be generally undesirable. Certain embodiments described hereincomprise at least one mechanism allowing removal of anchor (1), and inthose embodiments the size of these openings and/or slot may be limitedso that they can play their role of holding anchor (1), with bonegrowth, without impeding withdrawal of anchor (1) by means describedherein. Likewise, the shapes and sizes of notches (16) can also beadapted so as to oppose spontaneous withdrawal of anchor (1) whilepermitting intentional withdrawal by means of the mechanisms describedherein. These embodiments are thus not necessarily exclusive, and dependon the sizes of openings and/or of the slot (11) and/or the shapes andsizes of notches (16).

In certain embodiments, anchor (1) (and/or implant) comprise(s) awithdrawal mechanism, such as at least one grip resource (141) forexample, facilitating the intentional withdrawal of the anchor from theimplant and the vertebra using an anchor extraction tool, if necessary.The tool for extracting anchoring device (1) can have various forms andcan for example, comprise at least one a shaft curved at its end (like ahook) so as to penetrate into a recess and allow the withdrawal of theanchor by pulling on a shaft. For example, in certain embodiments,retaining stop (14) may be configured with a catch to facilitatewithdrawal of anchor (1). In some of these embodiments, such a catch canbe obtained by making at least one retaining stop (14, 140), in contactwith a complementary stop (25) of implant (2) provides for a free space(141) accessible by a tool. Complementary stop (25) or a nearby area ofimplant (2) may be configured with a space or gap that allows insertingan anchor extraction tool to pull on retaining stop (14). The withdrawalstops (15) are intended to be disengagable from their mating surface ofthe implant through a pressure exerted on at least one of the branchesto bring them closer to each other, thanks to the presence of the slot(11). It can therefore be provided, for example, as a withdrawalmechanism, a grip resource (141), for example such as housing on each ofthe branches, to allow a tool configured as a clamp, for example withbent ends to penetrate the housings, enabling to pinch the two branchesand pull on the anchor. It is therefore understood that variousembodiments of the present invention have the advantage of easy removalof the anchor (and therefore the implant), with a small congestion,while securing a good stability of the anchor.

In certain embodiments, anchoring device (1) comprises a mechanism thatwill assist stabilizing it in passage (21) in the implant. In certainembodiments, for example, a curved anchor is provided to pass through astraight passage of the implant, without deformation of the anchor (1)in spite of its curvature. These embodiments of implants (2) withstraight passage (21) are easier and less expensive to make than theembodiments of implant (2) with curved passage (21). However, for acurved anchor to pass through the straight passage, the height ofpassage (21) must be at least slightly greater than the thickness ofplate (10) in the embodiments of anchors with horizontal orientation(curved in the direction of the plate depth), or greater than the widthof plate (10) in the embodiments of anchors with vertical orientation(curved in the direction of the plate width). It is preferable, though,that the anchor has little or no play in passage (21) of implant (2), atleast to prevent movements of the anchor (and/or the implant) that willtend to make the anchor come out of the vertebrae. As noted elsewhere inthis disclosure, the body of the anchor in some configurations can havevarious radii of curvature between the two ends (anterior andposterior). In certain embodiments, the curvature of anchoring device(1) at the posterior end can be configured to engage wall of passage(21) sufficiently to improve the hold of anchoring device (1) on implant(2). In certain embodiments, the curved plate (10) of the body comprisesa portion near the posterior end which surfaces, preferablysubstantially planar, limit the play of the device in passage (21) ofimplant (2) by being slightly thicker than the rest of plate (10). It isunderstood that the thickened portions close to the posterior endgenerally correspond at most to the entire length of passage (21), butthey are preferably shorter, since the insertion of the anchor throughpassage (21) could be inhibited if they were too long. An instrument(e.g., 3, 4, 5) (described elsewhere in the disclosure) for insertinganchors (1) into the vertebrae through an implant is a potential objectof the invention, and therefore it is preferable for anchors (1) to beconfigured to pass through this instrument (3, 4). Thus, preferably athickened portion, possibly planar, on a part of the length of theanchor, will not impede guidance of the anchor into and through theinstrument. Thus, in various embodiments, the anchor may be stabilizedin the passage by means of at least one thickened stabilization portion,typically disposed on both branches (12, 13) of the anchor andpreferably close to the lateral edges of plate (10), with a thicknessgreater than that of the rest of plate (10). Stabilization portionshould not prevent retaining stops (14) from being stopped on theircomplementary stop (25) in the implant, so when these retaining stopsare created on one of the faces of the plate, the stabilization portionpreferably will thus be positioned on the face opposite the onecomprising retaining stops (14), which will improve their function ofstop. During insertion of various configurations of anchor (1), thestabilization portion may impede passage of the anchor if the increasein thickness is too abrupt. Thus, stabilization portion may comprise atleast one chamfer or beveled surface, for example where it meets theplate, substantially toward the anterior end, forming a slope so as toprovide a progressive increase in thickness up to the optimal thicknessthat presses anchor (1) in passage (21) and thus limits its play. Notealso that the thickness of thickened portion(s), called stabilizingportions, preferably will still be slightly less than the height ofpassage (21), so as to limit play without completely eliminating it.Nevertheless, in certain variants, this thickness (and/or height) willbe equal to or even somewhat greater than the height of passage (21)(and/or depth of the groove, respectively), notably in the case ofintersomatic cages whose material (such as PEEK, for example) allows aslight deformation.

A single anchoring device (1) may be used to anchor an implant (2) in avertebra, but in most applications at least two devices preferably willbe used to affix an implant (2) in the 2 adjacent vertebrae betweenwhich it is implanted (at least one anchor for each vertebra). Aspreviously mentioned, another potential object of the invention is ananchoring system for the implant comprising two anchoring devices (1),either identical to each other, or different, or complementary to eachother, at least one of which being configured according to one of theembodiments described in the present application. Thus, any of thevarious combinations of any of the embodiments of anchors and featuresdescribed herein whatsoever are within the scope of the invention, aswell as any combination (for example for two different vertebrae) of oneanchor according to one of these embodiments with an osseous anchoringdevice of another type, such as for example the type of one of theembodiments described in the above cited prior applications of theassignee of the present application (as long as the circumstances of theimplantation allow such combination).

Implants:

Intervertebral implants (2) comprising at least one passage (21)designed to receive anchoring device (1), such as a slit crossing aportion of the implant, a conduit, or another type of channel arrangedto receive anchoring device (1), are also within the scope of theinvention. Preferably, such implants are configured to receive at leastone anchoring device (1) comprising at least one curved and rigid plate,so as to allow the passage of this anchoring device (1) through thepassage (21) without deformation despite the curvature of the device(1). In most configurations, passage (21) crosses implant (2) from theperiphery of the implant (2) to an upper or lower surface of implant(2), along a preferably rectilinear and oblique trajectory suited to thecurvature of anchoring device (1) and the desired fixation of theimplant, as discussed in detail elsewhere in this disclosure. Thepresent application does not describe intervertebral discs in detail,but rather only describes various embodiments of intersomatic cagesdesigned for an arthrodesis. The person skilled in the art willnevertheless understand after appreciating this disclosure thatanchoring device (1) configured with various features and variouscombinations of features according to the invention may be used with aprosthesis comprising at least one posterior part configured to receiveanchor (1) as described herein, it being understood the designation asposterior is relative to the context of the specific circumstances ofthe implantation (e.g., the approach taken in the implantation and/orthe design of the prosthesis). For example, intervertebral prosthesesare known whose vertebral contact plates have a sufficient height tooffer a peripheral wall in which it is possible to create a passage suchas described herein for the insertion of the anchoring device. Likewise,intervertebral prostheses are known comprising two plates and a mobilecore between the plates and in which a peripheral wall of one of theplates limits the movements of the core. Therefore, the invention can beadapted to this type of prosthesis, by making at least one passage (21)in the wall, crossing said wall from a peripheral surface to a vertebralcontact surface (lower or upper) of the plate without hindering themovements of the various parts of the prostheses, such as the core, forexample. In various embodiments, the passage (21) in the plate need notcross the plate from a peripheral wall of the plate, but instead maycross the plate from one side to the other side (i.e., the upper surfaceto the lower surface, or vice versa), according an oblique axis(straight or curved) extending from a peripheral area of the prosthesisitself to a vertebral endplate, and the retaining stops (e.g., 14, 140)and/or withdrawal stops (e.g., 15, 150) of anchor (1) can be adapted tomake contact with the upper or lower surfaces of the plates (directly orvia stop surfaces arranged within the plate). For example, publicationsFR 2,879,436, WO 2006/120505 and US 2006/0136063, each of which isincorporated herein by reference (filed by the assignee of thisapplication), show a straight anchor with a retaining stop formed by acurved portion (hook-shaped) at the posterior end of the anchorconfigured to engage a stem near the edges of plates, and this generalapproach can be adapted to the embodiments disclosed herein after fullyappreciating this disclosure. The anchor (1) of the present inventionmay, for example, be curved and/or comprise at least one slot (11)and/or one or more retaining stops (e.g., 14, 140) and/or one or morewithdrawal stops (e.g., 15, 150), for use with such prostheses, andadditional features and/or combinations of features described herein maybe adapted to such use. In cases where the anchor is designed to crossthrough a plate of a prosthesis, the term “posterior” “part” or“portion”, or the term “peripheral wall” may be used to designate aportion near the periphery of the plate and accessible from a peripheralarea of the prosthesis.

Accordingly, certain embodiments of the present invention also concernan intervertebral disc prosthesis created with the means describedgenerally for implant (2). Various types of intervertebral discprostheses are known and no detail will be given here, except that itmay for example comprises at least two plates articulated together (forexample via articulation surfaces of the plates and/or an intermediatecore) and at least one of which comprises at least one passage (21).Intersomatic cages configured in accordance with the present inventionalso can have various forms, including configurations notably differentfrom the illustrative examples represented in the figures of the presentapplication. However, the present application also concerns intersomatic(interbody) cages for example as described in the present application,because they are particularly adapted to the problems of invasivenessand stability, and the use of anchors described in the presentapplication can be particularly advantageous in combination with suchcages. The description herein gives several non-limiting variants ofembodiment in reference to the attached figures, but after fullyappreciating this disclosure it will be understood that various implantsdevised in accordance with the present invention, at least when itconcerns a combination of an implant with at least one anchor, may haveother forms without departing from the spirit and scope of theinvention. Thus, in the present application, reference is made generallyto an intervertebral implant to designate both cages and prostheses, andalso osteosynthesis plates. When particular embodiments of intersomaticcages require reference to specific technical features of cages,however, reference may be made to an intersomatic cage rather than to anintervertebral implant.

Various intervertebral implants (2) described herein comprise a body(20), generally with at least one peripheral wall, a posterior portionof which (in accordance with the conventions adopted in thisdescription) comprises at least one passage (21) of suitable dimensionsto receive at least one anchoring device (1) configured according to theinvention. As explained elsewhere herein, the passage is may be straightto avoid the complex and expensive machining of a curved passage.However, with an implant separable into two parts at the passagejoinable together, it is easier to create a curved passage. Moreover, itis possible to manufacture implants, such as intersomatic cages, bymolding. It is then possible to more easily produce implants having acurved passage, for example by using a mold with a curved insert. Inaddition, certain recent techniques allow curved machining, especiallyin solid materials (for example metals). Therefore it is possible,particularly in the case of intervertebral disc prostheses whose platesare made of metal, to create a curved passage designed to receive thecurved anchor without much additional expense and burden over machininga straight passage. If passage (21) in the implant is curved, its heightcan be generally equal to (or very slightly greater than) the thicknessof anchor plate (10). If passage (21) is rectilinear (straight), itsheight preferably will be at least slightly greater than the thicknessof the curved anchor to permit it to pass without deformation of anchor(1) despite its curvature and its rigidity, as discussed elsewhere inthe present application. This technical feature of a curved passage (21)within the implant allows many embodiments of objects such as implantsand anchoring devices and/or systems in which the implant comprise acurved passage and in which the anchor is curved and comprises at leastone slot (11). These particular objects (i.e., any of these embodimentscomprising or associated with a curved passage in the implant) may beconfigured to solve the problems of stability of the fixation of implantand/or of invasiveness.

In some embodiments (not shown), passage (21) may have an entrance withan oblique orientation, in which the width of the passage is neitheroriented parallel to the plane of the disc space, nor oriented parallelto the axis of the spine, but intermediate and forming an angle withthese reference orientations (which are shown in most of the figures).In these embodiments, it is preferable to have two anchors (1) implantedin the same vertebra, and these anchors (1) preferably have a curvaturein the thickness of the plate and one or more radius (or radii) ofcurvature shorter than generally used for anchors which may beassociated with implants having an entrance of the passage orientedhorizontally (in the plane of the disc space), so that the anchor has acurvature sufficient to provide a good hold despite its obliqueorientation. This oblique orientation may be useful in variouscircumstances to address the problem of the stability of the anchor andthe implant when faced with various constraints of the implantation.Some embodiments may provide, for example, two such anchors associatedwith an implant comprising at least two passages with such obliqueorientation directed toward the same vertebra, but with oppositeorientation one in relation to other (for example, one entrance inclined45° to the right, and the other inclined 45° to the left). However,horizontal orientations of the passage are generally preferred, inparticular for an easier use, notably with an instrumentation such asdescribed in the present application.

The use of an anchor comprising a curved plate can be particularlyadvantageous with an osteosynthesis plate, in particular in the case ofthe disc space between vertebrae L5 and S1, because the orientation ofthe sacrum toward the back of the spine makes it generally difficult toaccess this area, even by an anterior approach. In general, even with acurved anchor (1), it is preferable to use an approach axis of theinstrumentation that is oblique (not perpendicular to the vertebrae) atthe level of the sacrum, because of the orientation of the latter towardthe back of the spine. The contact surface with the implant at theanterior end of the instrumentation may be inclined with respect to itslongitudinal axis (antero-posterior according to the convention used inthe present application) for allowing an optimal contact with theosteosynthesis plate. Nevertheless, the approach axis may besubstantially perpendicular to the osteosynthesis plate in somecircumstances and the instrumentation will then be adapted to thisapproach axis. Furthermore, it is also possible to use an anchorcomprising a straight plate, so as to allow this implantation in variouscircumstances (e.g., oblique path or path perpendicular to thevertebrae). The instrumentation will thus be adapted according to theshape of the anchor and the approach axis chosen. Implants devised withvarious features according to the invention may include osteosynthesisplates comprising a passage (21). The posterior part or peripheral wallmay then correspond to an osteosynthesis plate itself, forming a wallbetween the exterior and interior of the disc space. An anchor accordingto one of the embodiments described herein is then inserted into thepassage along an approach axis substantially perpendicular to theosteosynthesis plate (and the axis of the spine at the level of the discspace concerned). The passages (21) in the plate can be arranged to beplaced at the disc space or vertebral body level and lead to theendplates or directly in the periphery of the vertebral bodies. Theorientation of the entrances of the passages (21) may be oblique asexplained above. These fixation plates can be further fixed against thevertebrae with conventional screws, in addition to at least one anchoras described herein.

It is noted that, in a general manner, passages, holes, notches, stops,recesses, lugs, and other elements of the various objects of theinvention (anchors, anchor systems, implants, and instruments) may beformed by various methods, such as machining, drilling, casting,welding, etc., and the examples given herein are not to be construedrestrictively.

As noted elsewhere herein, the anchor (1) preferably comprises at leastone slot (11) on at least one posterior portion of the plate (10). Animplant can be fixed by means of several anchors, and it will thereforecomprise several passages (21). Preferably, there will be two passages(21) each oriented toward a different one of the vertebrae between whichthe implant must be implanted. Thus, in certain embodiments, peripheralwall comprises two passages (21) each oriented toward one of the upperand lower surfaces of implant (2) (vertebral contact surfaces of theimplant), so as to anchor anchoring device (1) in each of the vertebraebetween which implant (2) is designed to be implanted. Passage (21) ofan anchor (1) is created in wall of the implant so as to emerge on thevertebrae contact surface of the implant.

Various embodiments of the invention concern an intervertebral implant(2) comprising a body (20) having at least one part, called posterior,and at least one passage (21) configured to accommodate at least onedevice (1) for anchoring according to the invention, so as to allow thepassage of this rigid anchoring device (1) without distortion despiteits curvature. The passage (21) in these embodiments passes through theimplant (2) from the periphery to a top or bottom surface, typicallyalong a rectilinear and oblique path adapted to the curvature of theanchoring device (1), which is intended to be inserted substantially inthe plane of the implant (2), so as to orient the anchoring device (1)during insertion in the direction of the endplate of one of thevertebrae between which the implant (2) is intended to be implanted. Toretain the anchor (1) but allow the withdrawal of the anchor, which isfacilitated by the presence of the slot (11) thereon, the passage (21)has at least one surface complementary to at least one withdrawal stop(e.g., 15, 150) of the anchoring device (1). Note that thiscomplementary surface of the implant which receives the withdrawal stop(e.g., 15, 150) is generally formed in the passage (21) of the implant,preferably in the vicinity of its entry (or in the posterior peripheralwall) or its outlet (to a vertebral contact surface) or close to thisoutlet. This surface will be provided depending on the position of thewithdrawal stop (e.g., 15, 150) on the anchoring device (1). Severalsurfaces may be provided for receiving a plurality of withdrawal stops(e.g., 15, 150) of the anchoring device (1). Preferably, there is atleast one withdrawal stop (e.g., 15, 150) on each of the branches (e.g.,12, 13) of the anchoring device (1), but several withdrawal stops can beprovided on each branch. The stops are generally provided near theposterior end of the plate (10) since these are the rear ends of thebranches that can approach each other most easily thanks to the slot.The invention also relates to a combination of various embodiments ofthe implants described in this application with various embodiments ofthe anchors described in this application. Such a combination makes itpossible to respond in particular to the problem(s) of invasivenessand/or stability in various circumstances attendant to a particularimplantation. The invention may also involve an implant system with twoor more implants, with or without anchoring devices. In particular, inthe case of an implementation of cage by a posterior approach, twointersomatic cages are generally arranged parallel to each other oneither side of the sagittal plane. During a transforaminal implantation,it is expected in general only one cage, preferably of largerdimensions, will be implanted obliquely or perpendicularly to thesagittal plane.

In certain embodiments, the peripheral wall of implant (2) comprises twosuperposed passages (21) or offset passages if the encumbranceconstraints allow it, each oriented toward one of the upper and lowersurfaces, so as to anchor anchoring device (1) in each of the vertebraebetween which implant (2) is designed to be implanted. In otherembodiments, implant (2) comprises only one passage (21). Embodiments ofprostheses similarly may have only one plate that comprises a passage(21), and the other plate does not.

According to various embodiments of the anchor (1) or anchors (1) foruse with the implant, the passage for the implant may have variousforms, including at its entrance in the posterior part. In the case ofanchors whose branches (12, 13) are symmetrical, for example such asthose of embodiments corresponding to the examples shown in FIGS. 1A, 2Aand 5A, the entrance of the passage preferably is substantiallyrectangular (possibly with rounded corners) for the plate to passthrough it. Such a rectangular passage also may be suitable for someanchors whose branches are not symmetrical, for example like those ofthe embodiments corresponding to the examples shown in FIGS. 4A and 4C.However, for some anchor embodiments with asymmetrical branches, forexample such as those of embodiments corresponding to examples shown inFIGS. 3A and 3B, the passage preferably will be adapted to the fact thatthe branches are shifted (offset) relative to the other. In some ofthese embodiments, the anterior end of the anchor, at least to the pointwhere the branches will diverge, may be thinner (less thick) than theanchors of other embodiments, as mentioned above. However this solutionis not necessarily completely sufficient. Alternatively or additionally,it is possible to adapt the passage to the anchor and vice versa, asdetailed above. FIG. 3B shows a non-limiting and illustrative example ofcertain embodiments where the mutual adaptation of the anchor to theimplant minimizes the overall invasiveness. Instead of enlarging thepassage to allow insertion of the anchor, some embodiments of the anchorare provided with an offset at its front end so as to pass more easilyand the passage (21) has only a central portion (for example as shown inthe lower passage of FIG. 3B which is not equipped with an anchor)suited for the passage of the part of the anchor forming the junctionbetween the offset portions (at the front of the anchor), while the restof the passage is adjusted to the shapes and dimensions of the anchor(for example as shown on the upper passage of FIG. 3B which equippedwith an anchor). Note also that FIGS. 3A and 3B represent examples oftwo different alternatives. Indeed, the example in FIG. 3A, the implantcomprises an upper passage and a lower passage. The upper passage isconfigured to receive an anchor of the type shown in FIG. 3E for example(whose right branch is lower than the left branch). Similarly, the lowerpassage of the implant of FIG. 3A is configured to receive an anchor ofthe type shown in FIG. 3E for example (whose right branch is lower thanthe left branch). Thus, the implant is arranged so that the branches ofits anchors are offset, which implies less design constraints on theimplant, in its height. However, the example in FIG. 3B, the upperpassage is configured to receive an anchor of the type shown in FIG. 3Efor example (whose right branch is lower than the left arm) while thelower passage is configured to receive an anchor of the type shown inFIG. 3C for example (the right branch of which is higher than the branchon the left). This configuration imposes more constraints on the designof the height of the implant, but less in its width, including thepossibility of providing a grip resource (26) closer to the passages.Note that the positions and/or orientations and/or dimensions of thestops is (are) still fit to minimize the invasiveness of the examples inFIGS. 3A and 3B. It is generally provided a retaining stop on thelongest branch which is the offset towards the middle of the implant(taken in its height) than on the branch shifted to the upper or lowersurface of the implant. Various stops on the sides or edges can also bearranged, as explained above. Note also that, in all cases, the portionof the center of the passage (in width) is preferably arranged to allowa sufficient approximation of the two arms to allow the release ofwithdrawal stops (15). Before anchoring device (1) is implanted to holdimplant (2) in position, there is sometimes a risk that the implant (2)will move in the disc space. In certain embodiments, therefore, at leastone of the (upper and/or lower) vertebral contact surfaces of implant(2) may comprises notches (22) avoiding or limiting movement of implant(2) between the vertebrae (e.g., opposing sliding of the implant (2)between the vertebrae). In the case of an intervertebral discprosthesis, it is also possible to provide stabilization means on thesurfaces designed to be in contact with the vertebrae, such as notchesor fins or any type of structure preventing it from moving betweenvertebrae, so as to ensure (or improve) the stability of the prosthesesbefore its fixation by anchoring device (1). According to differentembodiments, these notches (22) or other stabilization means can havedifferent orientations. For example, notches (22) can be substantiallyparallel to one another and all oriented perpendicular to the implantinsertion axis, or notches (22) can, on the contrary, have differentorientations on different portions of implant (2), so as to preventmovement in various directions, for example such as a chevron pattern,relatively optimal for opposing movements in most directions, and, inparticular, movements perpendicular to the anteroposterior axis in theseexamples of cages with lateral insertion (i.e., movements along an axisin a sagittal or para-sagittal plane of the spine).

It is noted that in various figures of this application, examples ofcages represented include notches on their entire or almost entirevertebral contact surfaces, but not on the peripheral wall of the cage.The posterior part of the vertebral contact surfaces of the cage has nonotches in these examples. However, it is possible in variousembodiments to provide notches on this and other peripheral parts,provided they do not interfere with the various stops, ribs, and/orother elements and features that may be configured on these implantsand/or the anchors that may be associated with them.

In some embodiments, the intervertebral implant (2) comprises aninterbody cage. Typically, the cage comprises a body (2) which may betraversed by at least one hole (23, 24). For such a cage, the peripheralwall can thus define a cavity, opened on the upper and lower surfaces ofthe implant (those in contact with the vertebrae) designed to receive abone tissue graft or a substitute. Although an intersomatic cage cancomprise a cavity in its center defined by its wall, as shown in thefigures of the present application, a cage may also consist of a solidpiece without an inner cavity in other configurations within the scopeof the invention. This type of cage can be designed to be used at leastin pairs, for example, so as to define a cavity between the cages suchas is known in the prior art. Moreover, in the case of cages with atleast one cavity, and as particularly visible in certain examples shownin FIGS. 1, 2C, and 2, openings (24) can be created in wall of theimplant (the lateral walls in the examples shown), so as to also permitthe growth of bone tissue transversely through the disc space (i.e.,through the cage, parallel to the vertebral endplates). The holes (23,24) preferably traverse through the body and pass through not onlybetween the upper and lower faces, but also the lateral faces. Forexample, the illustrative and not limiting examples of FIGS. 1B, 2A, 3Aand 3B, the body (20) is traversed not only by vertical holes (23)(between the upper and lower surfaces) but also by horizontal holes (24)(between the side surfaces). The interbody cage (2) may therefore bewith or without a central recess, especially if several interbody cages(2) must be located in the same intervertebral space. Such cages aretypically used to contain bone (graft) that will grow within theintervertebral space and allow a fusion (arthrodesis) of two vertebraebetween which it is implanted. It is also known to use a substituteinstead of a bone graft. In all cases, the purpose of the cage (2) is torestore or maintain a space between the vertebrae. Before the growth ofthe graft and spinal fusion, the cage (2) should remain in place in thedisc space and various embodiments of the present invention facilitateits immobilization. Similarly, a prosthesis should typically be fixed tothe vertebral endplates in all cases. In certain embodiments, theintersomatic cage may comprise a reinforcement (28) crossing its cavityfrom side to side to reinforce the walls of cage (2), for example asshown in FIGS. 5B, 5C and 9B. The cavity is preferably equipped with areinforcement (28) to solidify the implant. This reinforcement can havedifferent shapes and orientations and can be oriented along the axis ofinsertion of cage (2) between the vertebrae (e.g., the longitudinal axisof the body), but it will preferably be transverse, thus connecting theinner walls of the cavity between the lateral faces (substantiallyperpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the body of the implant). Thistransverse orientation allows reinforcing the cage in the directionwhich might be the most fragile and generally allows it not to interferewith the passage of anchors. In various embodiments, the reinforcementcan have a lower height than the rest of the cage. This lower height ofthe reinforcement with respect to the rest of the cage permits the cageto take on various possible irregularities in the shapes of thevertebral endplates and to avoid completely dividing the graft orsubstitute contained in the cavity of the cage. The reinforcement may ormay not be provided with notches. On the other hand, in certainembodiments, a part of passage (21) emerges into cavity. Generally, thewall can be dimensioned as a function of passage (21), and passage (21)will be dimensioned and oriented as a function of anchoring device (1)in order to orientate and hold this device in the direction of thevertebra into which the anchoring device must be affixed. Moreover, theorientation can be chosen as a function of the desired fixation, asmentioned elsewhere herein (for example, by means of the curves selectedfor the anchors). Note, however, that the implant dimensions vary as afunction of the vertebrae between which they are designed to beimplanted and that the dimensions of the anchoring device can also beadapted to those of the implant as a function of those vertebrae.

The form of the implant, even at the level of passage (21), is notlimiting, as long as it allows at least one anchor (1) to be introduced.For example, cage (2) represented in the figures of the presentapplication and particularly visible in FIGS. 5B and 5C, has asubstantially oblong periphery. The shape of the body, in particularwith its anterior end, may have a shape such as, for example, the shapeof a bull-nose (bullet or mortar). Generally, the posterior end of thecage, which comprises the passage (21), may have a wall substantiallystraight and near which the cage will be held by an instrument (3, 4,5). Even in these examples, however, it is not necessary that the wallbe generally planar in this area. In particular, the present inventionpreferably provides that the entrance of the passage is equipped withsurfaces (25) complementary to the retaining stops (14), which mayinvolve non-planar forms. Thus, in some embodiments, the posterior partof the implant (2) which comprises the passage (21) for the anchoringdevice (1) includes, around the passage (21), at least one housing whichsurfaces (25) are configured to accommodate at least one retaining stop(14) of the anchoring device (1) without the latter protruding from thebody (20) of the implant (2). The anchor (1) is provide for notprotruding from the spine (at least), but even not to protrude too muchfrom the implant (because this could injure the tissues, providinghanging or gripping structures tending to move the anchor out of theimplant or interfere with insertion of a second anchor). Thus, theanchor (1) is preferably set to not protrude at all from the implant, asshown in FIG. 5B for example. On the other hand, in some embodiments,the posterior part which includes the passage (21) for the anchoringdevice (1) comprises, around the passage (21), at least one housingwhose surfaces (25) are configured to provide access to grip means (141)of the anchoring device (1), for grasping with the end of a tool for thewithdrawal of the anchor by moving the two legs (12, 13) towards eachother to disengage one or more withdrawal stops (e.g., 15, 150). Notethat in various illustrated intersomatic cages, the substantially oblongshape has a slight curve (especially visible in the top views), butagain, this shape is not restrictive with respect to the scope of theinvention even if it's preferred for any applications. Various figuresof the present application show that various shapes of intersomaticcages may have a peripheral wall including a planar side face (orsurface), and a slightly convex superior and inferior side faces (orsurfaces), a substantially flat posterior face (or surface), and acurved front face (or surface), but again, this shape is not restrictivewith respect to the scope of the invention. However, the shape such as abull-nose (bullet or mortar), visible in FIGS. 5B and 5C, for example,is particularly adapted to an implantation of the cage through aposterior or transforaminal pathway. A convex shape of the superiorand/or inferior surface(s) is advantageous for matching the shape of thevertebral endplates. It is indeed preferable that the shape of theimplant be selected according to the shape of vertebrae between which itwill be implanted and to the axis of the anatomical pathway foreseen forits implantation. In certain embodiments, at least one portion, forexample situated around the center of the implant, along thelongitudinal axis (L) (which may correspond to anteroposterior oroblique axis of the spine), is thicker than the rest of the implant, soas to take on the shape of the vertebrae. Preferably, the surfaces ofthe implant are adapted to the anatomy of the vertebrae. However, asymmetric shape is generally preferred for the implant to allow turningit upside down (i.e., the superior face disposed at the bottom and theinferior face disposed at the top) and/or use it according to differentimplantation types.

As mentioned above, some embodiments relate to an intervertebral implant(2) which is actually a cage. Such a cage preferably has a body (20)elongated along a longitudinal axis. It is preferably traversed by atleast one hole (23, 24) and comprises at least two side faces, an uppersurface, a bottom surface, a rear part and a front part. The shapes anddimensions of the body (20) are preferably configured for implantationby a posterior or transforaminal of the implant (2). The dimensionsidentified here as being configured for or adapted to implantationsthrough posterior and transforaminal approaches have implications whichare relatively clear for the skilled person. However, for clarity and ina purely illustrative and not limiting manner, the following size rangescan be cited: For a cage for a posterior implementation, a shorter body(20) is generally provided than for transforaminal implantation sincethe latter often implies that the cage is positioned obliquely betweenthe vertebrae and should cover a longer area. Thus, for a cage for aposterior implementation, a range of lengths of about 22 to 26 mm isprovided while a range of lengths of about 32 to 34 mm is provided for acage intended for a transforaminal implantation. Conversely, forproblems of invasiveness of the operation, the dimensions in height andwidth are critical. Cages whose width is only of the order of 10 or 11mm are particularly advantageous, in particular with anchors asdescribed in the present application. Moreover, according to theintervertebral height desired to be restored or maintained by the cage,one can choose one (or more) cage (s) from a range of height (orthickness), for example from as small as 7.5 mm to 14 mm for the minimumheight (e.g., located at the posterior face). Since the cage has oftenits upper and lower surfaces not parallel to impose an angle to thevertebrae, 14 mm minimum height gives such a height of 17 mm maximum.

Generally, the shape of implant (2) can vary and the shape of the end ofinstrument (3, 4, 5) that will be in contact with implant (2) canconsequently vary in various embodiments. Preferably, the body (20)comprises, in the vicinity of the posterior part, at least one fasteneror grip resource (26, 27) for an implantation instrument. The gripresource (26, 27) can be on the posterior part and/or a lateral face,preferably both for offering leverage between these two locations, whichfacilitates the manipulation of the implant (notably for a pivotalmotion as detailed hereafter). Implant (2) of various embodiments can infact have different shapes consistent with the implant having at leastone passage (21) suitable for insertion of anchoring device (1) andpreferably a fastener (or grip resource or attachment resources) (26,27) designed to cooperate with one end of an implantation instrument.Fastener (26, 27) can, depending on the various particular embodiments,be associated with a particular shape of the implant near this fastener(26, 27) to provide good cooperation with the instrument, or even have aparticular shape cooperating with a complementary shape of theinstrument. For example, the instrument can comprise a contact surfacefollowing the shape of the implant. Indeed, the posterior portion of theimplant is preferably configured for allowing the use ofinstrumentation. It can be seen for example on FIGS. 1B, 2A, 3A and 3Bthat the surfaces (25) around the entrance of passage are flat surfacesinclined towards the entrance of passage (21). This shape allows theretaining stops (14) not to protrude from the implant, but also allowsthat an instrument (5) with a complementary shape offers a contact whichis well distributed on the posterior portion of the implant, whichfacilitates the manipulation of the implant (notably for a pivotalmotion as detailed hereafter).

In certain situations, notably depending on the vertebrae between whichimplant (2) must be implanted, it is desirable for implant (2) toimpose, accommodate, or correct lordosis, kyphosis, or even scoliosis,in addition to maintaining the space between the vertebrae. Certainembodiments therefore provide that the mean planes passing through theupper and lower surfaces of implant (2) (e.g., of the cage or at leastone of the plates of the prosthesis) form an angle in at least onedirection imposing, accommodating, or correcting lordosis, kyphosis, orscoliosis with respect to the vertebrae between which implant (2) isimplanted. This general approach is described, for example, inapplications FR 2,869,528 (and WO 2005/104996 and US 2005/0246024) andFR 2,879,436 (and WO 2006/120505 and US 2006/0136063), each of which isincorporated herein by reference, in particular concerning the technicalfeatures allowing such inclination of the mean planes of the implants(i.e., thanks to an angle between the mean planes of at least one plateor between the contact vertebral surfaces of a cage, and/or thanks to anasymmetric nucleus and/or to an offset position of the nucleus).Reference to the mean plane reflects herein that the (upper and lower)vertebral contact surfaces are not necessarily planar, since they can beprovided with notches or can be convex or even concave; therefore a meanplane is intended to reflect the general orientation that a vertebraresting on the surface will take. For example, several of theintersomatic cages (2) shown in the figures of the present applicationare lordosis-inducing cages—they are designed to be inserted laterallyand their portion intended to be positioned on the anterior side of thevertebrae is thicker than the opposite portion. The upper and lowersurfaces (whether convex or flat, and whether or not fitted withnotches) are not parallel but are inclined and diverge from each otherin the direction of the front end. Thus, the dimensions of the body,between the upper and lower surfaces are larger near the front end thannear the rear end of the implant and used to impose a lordosis whenimplanted through a posterior or transforaminal. Surfaces can alsodiverge laterally so that the dimensions are more important on one sideface than another. Thus, a lordosis adapted to a transforaminalimplantation can be obtained and/or a scoliosis may be imposed orcorrected.

Although certain embodiments have the mean planes passing through theupper and lower surfaces of implant (2) forming an angle, straight cagescan be provided, which typically would thus be symmetrical and have themedial planes passing through the upper and lower surfaces of implant(2) configured substantially parallel to one another. Depending on thedesired implantation route for the implant, an angle may be imposed invarious directions. For kyphosis and lordosis, this direction isanteroposterior with regard to the spine, with either a thinning of theimplant toward the front of the spine to impose kyphosis, or a thinningof the implant toward the rear of the spine to impose lordosis. Toimpose scoliosis, the mean planes passing through the upper and lowersurfaces must form an angle along the other direction of the plane ofthe disc space (along a frontal or coronal direction, i.e., along anaxis oriented mediolaterally with respect to the spine) with a thinningof the implant toward the right or the left, depending on the desiredeffect. In general, concerning the interbody cages of the presentinvention which are intended for a posterior or transforaminalimplantation, cages imposing a lordosis are preferred because thisconfiguration avoids that the cage moves towards the part of the spinefrom which it has been implanted.

In certain embodiments, an example of which is shown on FIG. 5B, atleast one part of at least one of the superior and inferior surfacescomprises at least one bevel. For example, the body (20) of implant (2)comprises, at the level of an anterior part (using the directionconventions noted elsewhere herein, thus opposite the posterior partcomprising the passage (21) for the anchor), at least one beveledportion (29), for example such as at least one chamfer on at least oneperipheral portion of at least one of its upper and lower surfaces, soas to facilitate the insertion of implant (2) between the vertebrae.Note that the beveled portion (29) on at least one of the superior andinferior surfaces should not be too large compared to the dimensions ofthe body (for example having a length less than one third the length ofthe implant) for leaving a sufficiently large contact surface of thesuperior and inferior surfaces with the vertebral endplates. Forexample, one may have only a portion of the junction between, on the onehand, at least one of the superior and inferior surfaces and, on theother hand, the anterior part of the cage, which is beveled (for examplethe anterior third in the case of an interbody cage).

As is particularly visible in the example of the intersomatic cage ofFIGS. 5B and 5C, the anterior end of the cage has substantially theshape of the point of a shell (bull-nose, mortar), to optimize thepenetration of the cage between the vertebrae, especially when the spacebetween said vertebrae is insufficient. Chamfer or bevel (29) may bepresent on both the lower and upper surfaces of implant (2). Thischamfer (29) or beveled profile facilitates implanting implant (2) byconferring to it a somewhat lower height on its attack side (the onedesigned to be inserted first) than on the rest of the cage. Inaddition, it is also possible to bevel the side faces at the front endof the implant such that it has a bull-nose shape facilitating itspenetration between the vertebrae. On the other hand, it is possible tobevel at least a portion of the junctions of at least some of the sidefaces with the top and bottom surfaces. In particular, it is sometimesdesired to insert the implant in an orientation rotated 90° about itslongitudinal axis relative to the final position (that in which theupper and lower surfaces are in contact with adjacent vertebrae).Indeed, as explained above, the dimensions of the cage for implantationthrough a posterior or transforaminal approach may be such that thedimensions of the cage in height are greater than the width of the cage.It may therefore be desirable to first insert the cage with its lateralfaces disposed towards the top and bottom of the spine (the upper andlower faces find themselves arranged laterally of the spine), and thenrotate the cage to restore the height of the intervertebral space to thedesired value (obtained by the fact that the height of the cage has theselected value). One thus inserts the implant in an orientation rotated90° about its longitudinal axis relative to the final position, thenpivots it to place it in its final position in the disc space. In thistype of implantation, it may be desirable that at least a portion of atleast some of the junctions between the side faces and upper and lowersurfaces is beveled to facilitate rotation of the implant between thevertebrae. Bevels or rounded shapes or forms for the cage may thus beprovided, even if it is not this type of implantation which is planned,but it is generally preferred that a cage provides a maximum contactarea for a given size and therefore has selected junctions that are nottoo rounded. It is then preferable to provide such bevels when thisrotation is intended during the implantation, for an insertion of theimplant (2) in a position rotated 90° about its longitudinal axisrelative to the final position, where the upper and lower surfaces arein contact with the adjacent vertebrae between which the implant (2) isdesigned to be implanted. In general, it is sufficient that only some ofthe junctions are tapered (beveled), such as a single junction of thetwo junctions between the side faces and the upper surface and a singlejunction of the two junctions between the side faces and the bottomsurface. One preferably chooses the junctions that are opposite eachother (the left-bottom junction opposite the right-top junction, forexample), such as seen in FIG. 1B for example. In addition, it issufficient, in general, and particularly when the upper and lowersurfaces are inclined with respect to each other (e.g., when the implantis thinner at its rear end to its front end), that only a portion ofthese junctions is beveled. Indeed, it is sufficient to bevel only theportion at the level of which the cage is the thickest, such as seen inFIG. 1B for example.

As explained in this disclosure, the various configurations orembodiments of implants (2) preferably will be adapted to theconfigurations or embodiments of anchors (1), in particular for theretaining stops (14) and/or the withdrawal stops (15). Thus, in certainembodiments, the implant comprises, preferably near the passage (21), atleast one surface (25) generally facing the outside of implant (2) andforming a stop arranged for cooperating with at least one retaining stop(14) of anchoring device (1), such that once anchoring device (1) isfully anchored in a vertebra through passage (21), the implant (2) ispressed against said vertebra. This arrangement allows that theanchoring device impacted in a vertebra presses the implant (2) againstthe vertebra, without protruding from the periphery of the spine. Asmentioned elsewhere herein, for various configurations of the anchor,the surface(s) (25) may be situated above and/or below the passage, toreceive lugs projecting above and/or below the anchor, or on the lateralsides of passage (21) so as to receive two projecting lugs on the sidesof the body of anchoring device (1), or any combination of thesepossibilities. These surfaces (25) are preferably provided offsetcompared to the rest of the walls of the implant, that is to say in thethickness of the implant (2) (e.g., in a housing), so that the retainingstop (14) of the anchor (1) does not protrude from the implant (2).Indeed, the anchor (1) should not protrude from at least the peripheryof the spine, but it is particularly advantageous not to protrude toomuch from the implant or not to protrude (project) at all. Thus, areliable fixation is obtained with a high proportion of the anchorplanted in the vertebra while a small proportion remains in the implantand a null or almost null proportion protrudes from the rear of theimplant. Preferably, there will be 2 stops in each case. Preferably,stop (25) is a recess, the bottom of which forms the stop surface, withdepth sufficient to receive retaining stop (14) without it protrudingfrom peripheral wall (28). In certain embodiments, the implant comprisesat least one withdrawal stop (212) having at least one stop surfacegenerally facing the anterior end of the anchoring device inserted inpassage (21), this withdrawal stop (212) cooperating with at least onewithdrawal stop (e.g., 15, 150) of anchor (1), in order to oppose thewithdrawal of anchoring device (1) from implant (2).

Instrumentation:

In certain embodiments, an instrumentation (3, 4, 5) may be used toinsert implant (2) between the vertebrae and to guide anchoring devices(1) into the implant (2) and drive the anchoring devices (1) into thevertebrae. The invention may relate to the combination of elements (3,4, 5) of the instrumentation and to each instrument individually, suchas an impactor (4), an adapter or holder (3) and a guide (5). Suchinstrumentation (3, 4, 5), illustrative and non-limiting examples ofwhich are shown in FIGS. 7A, 7B, 7C, 8A, 8B, 8C, 9A and 9B, is intendedfor the implantation, between the vertebrae, of an intervertebralimplant (2) according to the invention and for implantation, in at leastone of these vertebrae, of at least one anchoring device (1) accordingto the invention. The instrumentation preferably includes at least oneholder (3) (or adapter or rack or charger) having a body (300) whichwidth is less than the width of said anchor (1) and comprising at leastone guiding surface (30) having at least one radius of curvaturesubstantially identical to at least one radius of curvature of a plate(10) of an anchoring device (1), to accommodate and guide the latterduring implantation. In addition, the instrumentation preferablyincludes at least one impactor (4) comprising a head (40) adapted toreceive the holder (3) and having two arms (401, 402) of length greaterthan the length of the body (300) of the holder (3) and spaced apart bya distance greater than or equal to the width of the body (300) of theholder, so as to allow to push, by sliding the impactor (4) along theholder (3), the anchoring device (1) accommodated on the holder (3).Finally, the instrumentation preferably also comprises at least oneguide (5) of elongate shape along a longitudinal axis extending betweena first end, called gripping end, for holding the implant (2), and asecond end, called pushing end, the gripping end having a head (50)equipped at its end with at least one gripping resource (56, 57)intended to cooperate with at least one grip resource (26, 27) of theimplant (2), the head (50) being traversed by a longitudinal passagewayleading to the implant and of shape and dimensions adapted toaccommodate at least partially the body (300) of the holder (3) and thearms (401, 402) of the impactor (4), the passageway comprising at leastone surface (53) for guiding said anchoring device (1), complementary tothe guiding surface (30) of the holder (3), for guiding said anchoringdevice (1) between these two guiding surfaces (30, 53) during sliding ofthe impactor (4) along the holder (3) into the head (50) of the guide(5). With such arrangement of the holder (3) and the guide (5), incombination with the arrangement of the guide (5) holding the implant(2) around the entrance of the passage (21) in the implant (2), achannel guiding the anchor (1) within the instrumentation and into theimplant (2) is formed. Such channel has the advantage of allowing areliable guiding of the anchor (1) avoiding the risk of an incorrectimplantation and/or of damaging the anchor or the implant by theinsertion of the anchor. Such channel is preferably uninterrupted andthus avoids griping of the anchor by a protruding structure during theimplantation.

The impactor preferably comprises at least one longitudinal body (41),such as a rod for example, which is intended to be disposed parallel tothe body (51) of the longitudinal guide (5). The body (51) of the guide(5) is preferably also in the form of a rod or a tube. It preferablycomprises a handle for holding it and allows to hold the implant at thelevel of its head (50). The impactor (4) is arranged so that the arms(401, 402) at its head (40) come into the passageway of the head (50) ofthe guide (5) for pushing at least one anchor (1) through the passage ofan implant mounted on the gripping end of the guide (5). The impactor(4) preferably has, at the opposite end to that provided with arms, apusher (42) on which one can push or knock so as to make the anchorpenetrate into the vertebrae through the implant. Preferably, theimpactor (4) has guide means (49) for guiding the sliding of theimpactor (4) along the longitudinal axis of the guide (5). These guidemeans (49) can comprise, for example, at least one tab (preferably twolegs) not parallel to the longitudinal axis of the impactor and whichextends to the guide (5), for example at its longitudinally extendedbody (51) and surrounds it at least partially or otherwise tracks it,thereby guiding the sliding of the impactor (4) along the longitudinalaxis of the guide (5), for example, as particularly seen in FIGS. 8A, 8Band 8C.

In some embodiments, the gripping end for holding the implant that is atthe end of the guide (5) comprises at least one gripping resource (56,57) comprising an end of a rod (56) sliding in the body (51) of theguide (5) when actuated by a handle or knob (52). The body is thengenerally a tube in which the rod (56) is movable, for moving into andout of a housing (26) of the implant (2) forming a grip resource of theimplant. In some embodiments, the rod (56) has a threaded endcooperating with an internal thread of the housing (26) for securing theimplant (2) when the rod is actuated by the handle or knob (52).

In some embodiments, the gripping resource (56, 27) of the guidecomprises, on the one hand, one end of a rod (56) sliding in the body(51) of the guide (5) when it is actuated by a handle or knob (52) intoand out of a housing (26) of the implant (2) forming a grip resource ofthe implant, and, on the other hand, a lug (57) arranged to be engagedin a second grip resource (27) on a side face of the body (20) of theimplant (2) and allowing to act as a lever arm for positioning theimplant (2) between the vertebrae. Preferably, the second grip resource(27) comprises a housing (270) for receiving a stud of the tab (57) ofthe guide, so as to improve the grip of the implant (2) by theinstrumentation. Such a second grip resource (27) may for examplecomprise a groove (27) receiving the tab (57) and equipped with ahousing (270) for the stud, as particularly seen in 1B, 2A, 3A, 3B, 5C,8A, 8B and 8C. One can provide only the second grip resource (27) formedby the groove and the housing for receiving the lug and tab, but it isgenerally preferred to combine both resources for ease of manipulationof the implant, particularly if it is desired to do an implantation with90° rotation around the longitudinal axis of the guide. Note that therod (56) of the guide may have an orientation which is not parallel tothe axis of the guide along the entire length of the rod (such as seenin FIGS. 8A and 8C) and that the housing (26) in the implant receivingthis rod will have a complementary orientation (such as shown in FIG.5C). Such an orientation may be obtained by a rod (56) provided withflexibility or with an elbow or joint. In some embodiments, the rod andhousing are threaded, but preferably not and it is rather preferred toprovide a second grip resource (27) for a good grip and lever arm.

In some embodiments, the gripping end of the guide (5) has shapescomplementary to the posterior part of the implant (5), with at leastone surface oriented in a plane not perpendicular to the longitudinalaxis of the guide and passing through two axes perpendicular to thelongitudinal axis of the guide (5), to facilitate rotation of theimplant around the longitudinal axis. Indeed, as mentioned previously,the surface (25) around the passage of the implant may form a housing inwhich the retaining stops will not protrude from the implant. This typeof arrangement, by providing that the (or each) surface (25) is orientedin a plane not perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the implant andpassing through two axes perpendicular to said longitudinal axis,provides support to facilitate the rotation of the implant by relievingthe forces exerted on the gripping means (56, 57).

In some embodiments, the head (40) of the impactor is traverses by apassageway capable of completely accommodating at least one holder (3)and to allow its removal through the end of the head which is oppositeto that equipped with the two arms (401, 402). Moreover, in someembodiments, such as seen in FIGS. 7A, 7B and 7C, the holder (3) has, atits end opposite to that guiding the anchoring device (1), a housing(32) (or notch) arranged to accommodate the front of the guiding end ofanother holder (3), which may have an inverse orientation. Thus, if onewishes to install two anchors through the passages of an implant, onecould mount a first holder (3) holding a first anchor (1) on the arms ofthe impactor and then impact the anchor through the implant mounted onthe guide. Then one moves the impactor backward, with the first holder(3) which will have slid along the arms, and then puts on a secondholder (3), in an orientation opposite to that of the first if theimplant has two passages with opposite orientations. The second holder,holding a second anchor (1) is then mounted on the arms of the impactor,and pushes the first holder back in the head (40) of the impactor. Byimpacting the second anchor, the second holder pushes the first holderinside of the impactor's head by itself sliding along the arm. Theimpactor is then removed and contains the two holders (3) that can beremoved, for example by an opening (43) provided at the opposite side ofthe head of the impactor (the side opposite to that provided arms), suchas seen in FIG. 9A. The head of the impactor is therefore preferably apassageway capable of completely accommodating at least one holder (3)to allow for removal at the end of the head which is opposite to thatequipped with two arms (401, 402). Note that a lateral window can beprovided on the head to help remove the holders.

In some embodiments, such as visible for example in FIGS. 7A, 7B and 7C,the holder comprises, on each of the upper and lower surfaces of itsbody (300), which are spaced apart by a distance greater than or equalto the height of arms (401, 402) of the impactor (4), a plate (34) ofwidth greater than that of the body (300), to stabilize the holder (3)on the arms (401, 402) of the impactor (4). In some embodiments, thehead of the impactor (4) has, in the passageway that crosses it, twogrooves (434) to accommodate the edges of the plate (34), such asparticularly shown in FIG. 9B. Preferably, the width of the plate isless than that of the anchoring device (1). Preferably, the plates endby flexible tabs (340) provided with a boss to pinch the impactor's arm(4), so as to stabilize the holder on the impactor when preparinginstrumentation.

In some embodiments, such as shown in FIGS. 7A, 7B and 7C, the holder(3) has at least one ridge (31) on which the slot (11) of the anchor (1)can be fitted, so that the anchor is then maintained more reliably, forexample waiting to get the holder on the impactor and the impactor inthe head of the guide (5). This ridge is preferably formed by an edge ofa front portion between the guide surface (30) and a plate (34) of theholder. The anchor then rests on the guide surface (30) which maintainsit horizontally and is retained by the ridge retains it laterally (theplate (340) of the holder may also be capable of maintaining the anchorhorizontally). This ridge (31) is preferably disposed between twosurfaces oriented with an angle between them which is adapted to thesize and shape of the slot (11) of the anchor (1). Preferably, thesesurfaces are complementary to the slot (11) or form a structure to blockthe anchor on it, for example in the manner of a Morse taper.

Methods:

Other potential objects of the present invention relate to variousembodiments of methods of preparing for an implantation of, and/ormethods for implanting, intervertebral implant (2) into anintervertebral space and for preparing the fixation of, and/or forfixing, the implant to at least one vertebra. These methods may comprisea step of assembling the implant (2) onto a guide (5), a step ofmounting the anchor (1) on a holder (3), a step of mounting the holderon the impactor, and a step of placing the impactor (4) relative to theguide, for example up to a penetration, at least partial, of the holderin the head of the guide (5). These various steps can be implemented indifferent orders, thanks to the arrangement of various objects of theinvention, as described in various embodiments discussed in the presentapplication.

In various embodiments, these methods for preparing the implantation maycomprise:

-   -   providing an anchoring device (1) in accordance with an        embodiment discussed in this present application;    -   providing an spinal implant (2) in accordance with an embodiment        discussed in this present application;    -   providing an implantation instrument (3, 4, 5) in accordance        with an embodiment discussed in this present application;        gripping the spinal implant (2) and/or anchor with the        implantation instrument (3, 4, 5);

In various embodiments, these methods for preparing the implantation mayfurther comprise a step of introducing at least one anchoring device (1)within the instrument (3, 4, 5).

In various embodiments, these methods for implanting a spinal implant(i.e., for inserting the implant within a disc space or onto vertebrae)may comprise the steps of the methods for preparing the implantation andmay further comprise:

-   -   inserting the spinal implant (2) in an intervertebral space        between adjacent vertebrae of a spinal column (or onto adjacent        vertebrae of a spinal column in the case of an osteosynthesis        plate);    -   presenting the anchoring device (1) along an approach axis that        is substantially perpendicular to the axis of the spine (at the        level of the adjacent vertebrae);    -   using the impactor (4) of the implantation instrument (3, 4, 5),        inserting the anchoring device (1) through the guide head (53)        of the guide (5) of the implantation instrument (3, 4, 5) and        through the passage (21) in the implant (2), with the anchoring        device (1) traversing at least a portion of the implant (2); and    -   using the impactor (4) of the implantation instrument (3, 4, 5),        fully inserting the anchoring device (1) through the implant (2)        and implanting at least part of the anchoring device (1) in one        of the adjacent vertebrae.    -   Note that, in the case of several anchors for an implant, the        step of mounting the anchor on the holder and of implanting the        anchor can be repeated, for example with a step of positioning        the second holder with an inverse orientation compared to the        first holder.

Most technical problems solved by various technical features describedin the present application may be related to the problem(s) of stabilityand/or invasiveness mentioned in the preamble of this presentdisclosure. After appreciating this disclosure, a person of skill in theart may design various embodiments combining the technical featuresdescribed in this application.

Each of these technical features or of these elements, described in atleast one embodiment or configuration and discussed below, may beisolated from other technical features of the object concerned by (orthe objects concerned by and/or associated with) said embodiment orconfiguration (and thus concerning the same or another element) and/ormay be combined with any other technical feature described herein, invarious embodiments or configurations, unless explicitly statedotherwise, or unless these features are incompatible and/or theircombination is not functional, in particular because the structuraladaptations that may be required by such isolation or combination offeatures are directly derivable from the appreciation of the functionalconsiderations provided by the present disclosure.

After fully appreciating this disclosure, a person skilled in the artwill understand that numerous embodiments and/or configurations invarious other specific forms are possible and within the scope of theinvention. Consequently, the present embodiments and/or configurationsshould be considered as non-limiting illustrative examples that may bemodified and still be within the scope of the attached claims, and theinvention should not be limited to the details provided above.

1-36. (canceled)
 37. A system for treatment of a spine comprising: an intervertebral implant comprising a first contact surface adapted and configured to contact a first vertebral endplate, a second contact surface adapted and configured to contact a second vertebral endplate, a peripheral surface extending between at least a part of the first contact surface and at least a part of the second contact surface, a first passage having an opening on the peripheral surface, the first passage extending from the opening toward the first contact surface and being adapted and configured for transit of a front end of an elongated, curved anchor from the peripheral surface to project from the first contact surface, a first insertion stop surface proximate to the first passage configured to abut a corresponding second insertion stop surface of an anchor, and a first withdrawal stop surface proximate to the first passage configured to abut a corresponding second withdrawal stop surface of an anchor; an anchor having a front end, a rear end, and a longitudinal axis extending between the front end and the rear end, the anchor comprising at least one plate that is elongated and curved along the longitudinal axis of the anchor and that has a width transverse to the longitudinal axis of the anchor, at least one slot oriented generally along the longitudinal axis of the anchor and separating the rear end and at least a reward portion of the plate into a first branch and a second branch, with the first branch being resiliently movable with respect to the second branch, a second insertion stop surface oriented angularly to the longitudinal axis of the anchor that is adapted and configured to abut the first insertion stop surface and hold the implant against the first vertebral endplate, and a second withdrawal stop surface disposed on one of the branches and oriented angularly to the longitudinal axis of the anchor, the second withdrawal stop surface being adapted and configured to abut the first withdrawal stop surface and inhibit withdrawal of the anchor from the implant; and instrumentation adapted and configured for insertion of the implant into an intervertebral space, for insertion of the anchor in the implant, and for fixation of the implant to the first vertebral endplate, the instrumentation comprising a holder for the anchor comprising a body and a guide surface formed in the body that corresponds to the curvature of the anchor plate, the body having a width less than the width of the plate, an impactor comprising a first head configured and adapted to receive the holder and a driver configured and adapted to drive the anchor, and a guide elongated along a longitudinal axis extending between a gripping end of the guide and a pushing end of the guide, the gripping end having a second head configured and adapted to grip the implant and comprising a second passage along the longitudinal axis of the guide, the second passage having a shape and dimensions adapted and configured for passage of the anchor and at least part of the holder.
 38. The system of claim 37, in which the slot separates the plate in the width of the plate.
 39. The system of claim 37, in which the anchor has a thickness transverse to the longitudinal axis of the anchor and to the width of the plate, and the slot separates the plate in its thickness.
 40. The system of claim 39, in which the second withdrawal stop surface extends from one of the branches in the thickness.
 41. The system of claim 39, in which the slot also separates the plate in the width of the plate.
 42. The system of claim 37, in which the slot is wider at the rear end.
 43. The system of claim 42, in which the slot has a stress-relief portion opposite the rear end.
 44. The system of claim 38, in which the slot extends generally perpendicular to the width of the plate.
 45. The system of claim 38, in which the anchor has a thickness transverse to the longitudinal axis of the anchor and to the width of the plate, and the slot extends diagonally through the thickness.
 46. The system of claim 45, in which the rear end of the first branch and the rear end of the second branch are offset along the thickness.
 47. The system of claim 37, in which the slot has a beveled first edge along the first branch and a beveled second edge along the second branch, with the beveled first edge generally facing the beveled second edge.
 48. The system of claim 37, in which the slot is curved along the longitudinal axis of the anchor.
 49. The system of claim 37, in which the second withdrawal stop surface faces toward the rear end and the anchor comprises a beveled surface disposed on same branch as the second withdrawal stop surface with the beveled surface being oriented obliquely to the longitudinal axis of the anchor and facing away from the rear end.
 50. The system of claim 37, in which the second withdrawal stop surface is disposed on the first branch; the implant comprises a third withdrawal stop surface; and the anchor comprises a fourth withdrawal stop surface disposed on the second branch and oriented angularly to the longitudinal axis of the anchor, the fourth withdrawal stop surface being adapted and configured to abut the third withdrawal stop surface and inhibit withdrawal of the anchor from the implant.
 51. The system of claim 37, in which the second insertion stop surface is formed by a thickening at the rear end.
 52. The system of claim 37, in which the second insertion stop surface is formed by lug extending along the width of the plate.
 53. The system of claim 37, in which the first branch has a curvature greater than the curvature of the second branch.
 54. The system of claim 37, in which: the holder body has a length transverse to the width of the holder body; and the driver comprises generally parallel first and second arms, each of the first and second arms having a length greater than a length of the holder body, and a gap between the first and second arms at least as wide as the width of the holder body.
 55. The system of claim 54, in which: the holder body has a height transverse to the length and width of the holder body, with opposing first and second planes generally parallel to the length and the width of the holder body defining the height of the holder body; the holder comprises opposing first and second plates, the first plate oriented generally in the first plane and the second plate oriented generally in the second plane, with the first and second plates spaced apart by the height of the holder body and each of the first and second plates having a width greater than the width of the gap between the first and second arms; and each of the first and second arms have a height less than the height of the holder body.
 56. The system of claim 54, in which the first head comprises a passageway having sufficient dimensions to enclose the holder. 